[libvirt] [PATCH v2 08/11] tests: qemuxml2argv cpu feature syntax

Jiri Denemark jdenemar at redhat.com
Fri Dec 16 17:18:59 UTC 2016

On Fri, Dec 16, 2016 at 12:10:55 -0500, Collin L. Walling wrote:
> On 12/15/2016 11:10 AM, Jiri Denemark wrote:
> > We already have a lot of tests that use the ±feature syntax so there's
> > no real need to add another one. However, we could use it as a negative
> > test since s390 does not support the old syntax. So how about:
> > 
> >      DO_TEST("cpu-s390-features", QEMU_CAPS_KVM,
> >      DO_TEST_FAILURE("cpu-s390-features", QEMU_CAPS_KVM);
> > 
> > Of course, patch 5/11 would need to be modified to actually refuse to
> > start an s390 domain with CPU features in the XML on QEMU without
> I agree with not testing for +/- on s390x. And since s390x doesn't
> even support CPU models until 2.8 (which is conveniently when
> query-cpu-model-expac was introduced!), we don't necessarily
> need to do any kind of error checking in the CPU feature
> argument generation code. We will encounter an error
> relating to "no support for CPU models" first.

Oh nice. In that case we should add a domain capabilities test case for
QEMU 2.7.0 to make sure we do not advertise support for any CPU mode.


More information about the libvir-list mailing list