[libvirt] question about rdma migration
Michael R. Hines
mhines at digitalocean.com
Fri Feb 19 22:09:47 UTC 2016
Besides, If it didn't work as root or qemu, then you simply didn't get
the configuration setup correctly.
I advise you to get it working correctly first (via opening another
shell and verifying that the limits are set by default)
before embarking on a change to libvirt.
/*
* Michael R. Hines
* Platform Engineer, DigitalOcean.
*/
On 02/19/2016 04:37 PM, Roy Shterman wrote:
> Yes,
>
> I tried also running it as root user and it also didn't worked.
>
> Do you know where libvirt (or QEMU) gets the value for process
> MEMLOCK? maybe i can change this value in libvirt code?
>
> Regards,
> Roy
>
> On Fri, Feb 19, 2016 at 11:15 PM, Michael R. Hines
> <mhines at digitalocean.com <mailto:mhines at digitalocean.com>> wrote:
>
> Is the QEMU process (after startup) actually running as the QEMU
> userid ?
>
> /*
> * Michael R. Hines
> * Platform Engineer, DigitalOcean.
> */
>
> On 02/19/2016 02:43 PM, Roy Shterman wrote:
>> First off all thank you for your answer,
>>
>> I couldn't figured how to start virtual machine with increased
>> MEMLOCK,
>>
>> tried to add into /etc/security/limits.d
>>
>> qemu soft memlock 3221225
>> qemu hard memlock 3221225
>>
>> so max locked-in-memory will be 3G, but it didn't worked.
>>
>> still has MEMLOCK of 60kb per each VM.
>>
>> Maybe you can spot what I'm doing wrong?
>>
>> On Tue, Feb 9, 2016 at 5:16 PM, Michael R. Hines
>> <michael at hinespot.com <mailto:michael at hinespot.com>> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Roy,
>>
>> On 02/09/2016 03:57 AM, Roy Shterman wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I tried to understand the rdma-migration in qemu code and
>> i have two questions about it:
>>
>> 1. I'm working with qemu-kvm using libvirt and i'm getting
>>
>> MEMLOCK max locked-in-memory address space 65536
>> 65536 bytes
>>
>> in qemu process so I don't understand how can you use
>> rdma-pin-all with such low MEMLOCK.
>>
>> I found a solution in libvirt to lock all vm memory in
>> advance and to enlarge MEMLOCK.
>> It uses memoryBacking locking and memory tuning
>> hard_limit of vm memory but I couldn't find a usage of
>> this in rdma-migration code.
>>
>>
>> You're absolutey right, the RDMA migration code itself
>> doesn't set this lock limit explicitly because there are
>> system-wide restrictions in both appArmour,
>> /etc/security, as well as SELINUX that restrict applications
>> from arbitrarily setting their maximum memory lock limits.
>>
>> The other problem is CGROUPS: If someone sets a cgroup
>> control for maximum memory and forgets about that mlock()
>> limits, then
>> there will be a conflict.
>>
>> So, libvirt must have a policy to deal with all of these
>> possibilities, not just handle a special case for RDMA migration.
>>
>> The only way "simple" way (without patching the problems
>> above) to apply a higher lock limit to QEMU is to set the
>> ulimit for libvirt
>> (or for QEMU if starting QEMU manually) in your environment
>> or the command line with $ ulimit # before attempting the
>> migration,
>> then the RDMA subsystem will be able to lock the memory
>> successfully.
>>
>> The other option is to use /etc/security/limits.conf and set
>> the option for a specific libvirt process user and make sure
>> your libvirt/qemu
>> are not running as root.
>>
>> QEMU itself also has a "mlock" option built into the command
>> line, but it also suffers from the same problem --- you have
>> to find
>> a way (currently) to increase the limit before using the option.
>>
>> 2. Do you have any comparison of IOPS and bandwidth
>> between TCP migration and rdma migration?
>>
>> Yes, lots of comparisons.
>>
>> http://wiki.qemu.org/Features/RDMALiveMigration
>> http://www.canturkisci.com/ETC/papers/IBMJRD2011/preprint.pdf
>>
>>
>> Regards,
>> Roy
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> libvir-list mailing list
>> libvir-list at redhat.com <mailto:libvir-list at redhat.com>
>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/attachments/20160219/5f1e6060/attachment-0001.htm>
More information about the libvir-list
mailing list