[libvirt] [PATCH] rbd: Do not append Ceph monitor port number 6789 if not provided

John Ferlan jferlan at redhat.com
Tue Jan 5 22:36:46 UTC 2016



On 12/28/2015 10:33 AM, Wido den Hollander wrote:
> If no port number was provided for a storage pool libvirt would default
> to port 6789.
> 
> librbd/librados will however already default to 6789 when no port number
> is provided.

reads better as:

If no port number was provided for a storage pool libvirt defaults to
port 6789; however, librbd/librados already default to 6789 when no port
number is provided.

> 
> In the future Ceph will however switch to a new port for the Ceph monitors

s/Ceph will however switch/Ceph will switch/

> since port 6789 is already assigned to a different application by IANA.
> 
> Port 6789 is assigned to SMC-HTTPS and Ceph now has port 3300 assigned as
> the 'Ceph monitor' port.
> 
> In this case it is the best solution to not hardcode any port number into
> libvirt and let librados handle the connection.
> 
> Only if a user specifies a different port number we pass it down to librados,
> otherwise we leave it blank.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Wido den Hollander <wido at widodh.nl>
> ---
>  src/storage/storage_backend_rbd.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 

Is there a specific librdb/librados that would "fail" if a port number
wasn't assigned/passed?

Think in terms of support some "older" version that some customer may
have installed.

Also, I searched on "6789" and found:

src/util/virstoragefile.c/virStorageSourceRBDAddHost

docs/formatdomain.html.in

I think in particular the docs will need to be updated...

John

> diff --git a/src/storage/storage_backend_rbd.c b/src/storage/storage_backend_rbd.c
> index cdbfdee..df4a3d3 100644
> --- a/src/storage/storage_backend_rbd.c
> +++ b/src/storage/storage_backend_rbd.c
> @@ -173,7 +173,7 @@ static int virStorageBackendRBDOpenRADOSConn(virStorageBackendRBDStatePtr ptr,
>      for (i = 0; i < source->nhost; i++) {
>          if (source->hosts[i].name != NULL &&
>              !source->hosts[i].port) {
> -            virBufferAsprintf(&mon_host, "%s:6789,",
> +            virBufferAsprintf(&mon_host, "%s,",
>                                source->hosts[i].name);
>          } else if (source->hosts[i].name != NULL &&
>              source->hosts[i].port) {
> 




More information about the libvir-list mailing list