[libvirt] [PATCH v3 4/7] remote: implement storage lifecycle event APIs

[Martin Kletzander]

On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 05:46:56PM +0200, Martin Kletzander wrote:
>On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 08:44:09AM -0400, Cole Robinson wrote:
>>On 06/15/2016 08:42 AM, John Ferlan wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> I do have dwarves installed, but the makefile is complaining about pdwtags:
>>>>
>>>> http://www.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/2016-June/msg00899.html
>>>>
>>>> That's with F24. Maybe jovanka is missing dwarves, she's on f23, or maybe the
>>>> f23 packages are similarly affected
>>>>
>>>>
>>> For reference I have dwarves installed too:
>>>
>>> dwarves.x86_64
>>>              1.10-8.fc23
>>>                        @fedora
>>>
>>> on my f23 box and I've been seeing those messages as well. I tried
>>> investigating once, but got quickly lost...
>>>
>>>
>>> WARNING: pdwtags appears broken; skipping the
>>> virkeepaliveprotocol-struct test
>>> WARNING: pdwtags appears broken; skipping the lock_protocol-struct test
>>> WARNING: pdwtags appears broken; skipping the remote_protocol-struct test
>>> WARNING: pdwtags appears broken; skipping the qemu_protocol-struct test
>>> WARNING: pdwtags appears broken; skipping the lxc_protocol-struct test
>>> WARNING: pdwtags appears broken; skipping the virnetprotocol-struct test
>>> WARNING: pdwtags appears broken; skipping the admin_protocol-struct test
>>> WARNING: pdwtags appears broken; skipping the
>>> lxc_monitor_protocol-struct test
>>>
>>
>>Huh... what distro/dwarves version are others using then?
>>
>
>I'm running the latest git master from:
>
>  https://git.kernel.org/cgit/devel/pahole/pahole.git/
>
>Yes, it has less than 40 commits on top of the "latest" release (4 years
>ago), but it looks like it works.  I remember updating because of
>similar problem.
>
>Looking at the version currently found in f24 it is kind of weird:
>
>  $ pdwtags src/remote/.libs/libvirt_driver_remote_la-remote_protocol.o
>  die__process_unit: DW_TAG_restrict_type (0x37) @ <0x1ed> not handled!
>
>The error message itself shouldn't be a problem, when I try it with the
>latest one from git I get bunch of those on stderr, but all the stuff I
>need on stdout.
>
>Whoa, so pdwtags in f24 is version 1.9 which is 2 years older than the 4
>your old 1.10... Looks like there's nobody packaging that for Fedora.
>

No, sorry, my bad, it's 1.10-9, "1.9" was just the output of "pdwtags
--version".  And it's the same as with the latest one.

>>- Cole
>>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/attachments/20160615/8b472a6e/attachment-0001.sig>