[libvirt] [PATCH] qemu: Permit PCI-free aarch64 mach-virt guests

Laine Stump laine at laine.org
Fri Jun 17 16:01:58 UTC 2016


On 06/17/2016 11:46 AM, Martin Kletzander wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 11:36:05AM -0400, Laine Stump wrote:
>> On 06/17/2016 08:43 AM, Andrea Bolognani wrote:
>>>            * other than the pcie-root. This is so that there will be 
>>> hot-pluggable
>>> -         * PCI slots available
>>> +         * PCI slots available.
>>> +         *
>>> +         * We skip this step for aarch64 mach-virt guests, where we 
>>> want to
>>> +         * be able to have a pure virtio-mmio topology
>>>            */
>>>           if (virDomainControllerFind(def, 
>>> VIR_DOMAIN_CONTROLLER_TYPE_PCI, 1) < 0 &&
>>> +            !qemuDomainMachineIsVirt(def) &&
>>
>> You're assuming that the only virt* machinetypes will be aarch64, which
>> may be reasonable now, but not in the future (periodically someone from
>> qemu will mention the idea of a "virt" machinetype for x86, which is
>> legacy-free and accepts only virtio devices). Wouldn't a more specific
>> comparison be better here (and in the other places in this patch)?
>>
>
> Just my $.02 here, but since our qemuDomainMachineIsVirt() is made
> specifically for aarch64 arches, I think the right thing to do would be
> just add architecture check into that function as using it throughout
> the codebase ought to actually be what all the callers want.


Sure, a single function would be great. Its name should reflect that it 
is for *aarch64* virt machines though (in anticipation of other arches 
getting a virt machinetype).




More information about the libvir-list mailing list