[libvirt] [PATCH 06/19] util: Move and rename virStorageAuthDefParseSecret

John Ferlan jferlan at redhat.com
Tue Jun 21 15:29:15 UTC 2016



On 06/21/2016 10:05 AM, Peter Krempa wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at 20:27:45 -0400, John Ferlan wrote:
>> Move to virsecret.c and rename to virSecretParseSecret. Also convert to
> 
> NACK to the naming. It implies that it parses <secret> xmls.
> 

The "Secret" just replaced the "StorageAuthDef" since no longer was a
<secret> going to be only an element of <auth>.

>> usage xmlNodePtr and virXMLPropString rather than virXPathString.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: John Ferlan <jferlan at redhat.com>
>> ---
>>  po/POTFILES.in            |  1 +
>>  src/libvirt_private.syms  |  1 +
>>  src/util/virsecret.c      | 44 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>  src/util/virsecret.h      |  5 +++-
>>  src/util/virstoragefile.c | 71 ++++++++++++-----------------------------------
>>  5 files changed, 67 insertions(+), 55 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/src/libvirt_private.syms b/src/libvirt_private.syms
>> index 32d5179..ca65885 100644
>> --- a/src/libvirt_private.syms
>> +++ b/src/libvirt_private.syms
>> @@ -2211,6 +2211,7 @@ virSecurityLabelDefNew;
>>  # util/virsecret.h
>>  virSecretLookupDefClear;
>>  virSecretLookupDefCopy;
>> +virSecretParseSecret;
> 
> It should be named similarly to the above or to the original name.
> 
> ACK to the code as long as you name it reasonably
> 

OK - is virSecretLookupParseSecret more palatable? Or an even longer
name virSecretLookupParseDomainSecret.

Up through this point it's only a subelement of <auth>, but adding to
<encryption> short term and to <serial> for TLS secrets in another series.

Also, As I was working in the TLS code - I began to realize using
'secdef' for variable names became confusing, so I changed to
'seclookupdef'...  That was posted as a separate series

I also note that patch 5 doesn't yet have any review, but this patch
relies on that.

Tks -

John






More information about the libvir-list mailing list