[libvirt] [PATCH] daemon: Drop dependency on libvirt-admin.so

Daniel P. Berrange berrange at redhat.com
Fri Jun 24 14:06:56 UTC 2016


On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 03:59:38PM +0200, Michal Privoznik wrote:
> On 24.06.2016 15:33, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> > On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 03:12:23PM +0200, Michal Privoznik wrote:
> >> Currently, the daemon requires libvirt-admin.so because the
> >> functions encoding/decoding RPC messages for admin APIs live
> >> there. But this makes it very hard to split admin API into its
> >> own separate package: if libvirt-admin.so is going to live in a
> >> separate package than the daemon, either both packages must be
> >> installed or none.
> >> Solve this by statically linking the RPC message handling
> >> functions with the daemon.
> > 
> > I'm not sure I see any need for a separate package for libvirt-admin.so
> > For libvirt-qemu.so and libvirt-lxc.so we keep them in libvirt-client
> > RPM, and I'd expect libvirt-admin.so to be there too really.
> 
> So libvirt-client would contain not only virsh (and other .so files) but
> virt-admin binary too? Okay, if that's what we want my patch is useless.
> If we, however, want a separate package for libvirt-admin (which is kind
> of special compared to libvirt-qemu.so and libvirt-lxc.so), then I guess
> we need this patch.

Hmm, i guess libvirt-admin is only needed if libvirtd is actually
present on the host. So I guess we could argue that virt-admin
and libvirt-admin.so should just be a part of libvirt-daemon RPM.


Regards,
Daniel
-- 
|: http://berrange.com      -o-    http://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange/ :|
|: http://libvirt.org              -o-             http://virt-manager.org :|
|: http://autobuild.org       -o-         http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :|
|: http://entangle-photo.org       -o-       http://live.gnome.org/gtk-vnc :|




More information about the libvir-list mailing list