[libvirt] [PATCH 01/15] schema: make pci slot and function optional

[Michal Privoznik]

On 24.03.2016 20:25, Laine Stump wrote:
> The pcie-switch-downstream-port and pcie-root-port controllers have
> only a single slot, numbered 0, and the greate majority of all guest

s/greate/great/

> PCI devices are plugged into function 0 of whatever slot they're
> using. The parser makes these optional, setting them to 0 when not
> specified, and it's logical for the schema to also make them optional.
> ---
>  docs/schemas/basictypes.rng | 16 ++++++++++------
>  1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/docs/schemas/basictypes.rng b/docs/schemas/basictypes.rng
> index a83063a..084d403 100644
> --- a/docs/schemas/basictypes.rng
> +++ b/docs/schemas/basictypes.rng
> @@ -75,12 +75,16 @@
>      <attribute name="bus">
>        <ref name="pciBus"/>
>      </attribute>
> -    <attribute name="slot">
> -      <ref name="pciSlot"/>
> -    </attribute>
> -    <attribute name="function">
> -      <ref name="pciFunc"/>
> -    </attribute>
> +    <optional>
> +      <attribute name="slot">
> +        <ref name="pciSlot"/>
> +      </attribute>
> +    </optional>
> +    <optional>
> +      <attribute name="function">
> +        <ref name="pciFunc"/>
> +      </attribute>
> +    </optional>
>      <optional>
>        <attribute name="multifunction">
>          <ref name="virOnOff"/>
> 

Well, looking into our PCI address parser, all of the attributes are
optional, even domain and bus. None of my guests have non-zero domain
actually ;-). Your call whether to loosen schema even more or stick with
your approach.

ACK

Michal