[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: [libvirt] [PATCH] gitignore: ignore virt(log|lock)d.(service|socket)
- From: Andrea Bolognani <abologna redhat com>
- To: Cole Robinson <crobinso redhat com>, libvirt-list redhat com
- Subject: Re: [libvirt] [PATCH] gitignore: ignore virt(log|lock)d.(service|socket)
- Date: Tue, 03 May 2016 15:35:48 +0200
On Tue, 2016-05-03 at 09:20 -0400, Cole Robinson wrote:
> On 05/03/2016 09:17 AM, Andrea Bolognani wrote:
> > On Tue, 2016-05-03 at 09:01 -0400, Cole Robinson wrote:
> > >
> > > ---
> > > Pushed as trivial
> > >
> > > .gitignore | 4 ++++
> > > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore
> > > index 6021403..a0de097 100644
> > > --- a/.gitignore
> > > +++ b/.gitignore
> > > @@ -156,8 +156,12 @@
> > > /src/virt-aa-helper
> > > /src/virtlockd
> > > /src/virtlockd.init
> > > +/src/virtlockd.service
> > > +/src/virtlockd.socket
> > > /src/virtlogd
> > > /src/virtlogd.init
> > > +/src/virtlogd.service
> > > +/src/virtlogd.socket
> > > /tests/*.log
> > > /tests/*.pid
> > > /tests/*.trs
> >
> > Should we just ignore
> >
> > *.init
> > *.service
> > *.socket
> >
> > and be done with it? They're all generated AFAICT.
>
> I don't really have strong feelings one way or the other
I'll go ahead and make the change then :)
--
Andrea Bolognani
Software Engineer - Virtualization Team
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]