[libvirt] [PATCH 0/4] docs: User Overpass 3.0 as a font

[Martin Kletzander]

On Fri, Nov 18, 2016 at 04:26:48PM +0100, Michal Privoznik wrote:
>On 18.11.2016 16:21, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
>> On Fri, Nov 18, 2016 at 04:05:50PM +0100, Martin Kletzander wrote:
>>> I heard Overpass 3.0 was released, so let's update to that.  There are
>>> some changes that I noticed.  There are more font weights than we had
>>> before.  The one we decided to use is now probably the 'semibold' one.
>>> So the regular font is a little thinner, but not as much as the
>>> 'light' one.  I think this time it is the perfect middle ground
>>
>> Yep, a little bit thinner is exactly what I wanted but couldn't
>> get with previous version :-)
>>
>>> between the discussed variants in the previous thread.  Also it makes
>>> the mono font the same size as the other font.  I kinda like that, but
>>> if others don't, we can add font-size: 12px; to the style.
>>
>> I think I could see benefit in the monospace font being one or two pt
>> smaller that in your screenshot, because monospace text gets very
>> wide very quickly
>
>Exactly what I wanted to say. With the current version I can clearly see
>difference between say <code/> and the regular test. With your patches
>is not that visible in a block of text.
>

While difference between the code and the rest of the paragraph would be
nice to see, using font size for that hurts my eyes like green text on
purple background.  We can change the background of <code/> to light
grey, I've seen it in some places and it looked nice.  And then we can
shrink the <pre/> font and be done with it.

I tried adding:

dd code, p code {
  background-color: #eeeeee;
}
pre {
  font-size: 90%;
}

And I like it.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 801 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/attachments/20161120/f8e926ea/attachment-0001.sig>