[libvirt] [PATCH v2 27/31] tests: Update capabilities for QEMU 2.6.0 (ppc64le)

[Jiri Denemark]

On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 00:21:23 +0100, Jiri Denemark wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Jiri Denemark <jdenemar at redhat.com>
> ---
>  tests/domaincapsschemadata/qemu_2.6.0.ppc64le.xml  |    5 +-
>  tests/domaincapstest.c                             |    2 +-
>  .../caps_2.6.0.ppc64le.replies                     | 1324 +++++++++++++++++++-
>  tests/qemucapabilitiesdata/caps_2.6.0.ppc64le.xml  |  436 ++++++-
>  4 files changed, 1753 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/tests/domaincapsschemadata/qemu_2.6.0.ppc64le.xml b/tests/domaincapsschemadata/qemu_2.6.0.ppc64le.xml
> index f6a98f7..b3d2d2a 100644
> --- a/tests/domaincapsschemadata/qemu_2.6.0.ppc64le.xml
> +++ b/tests/domaincapsschemadata/qemu_2.6.0.ppc64le.xml
> @@ -19,13 +19,14 @@
>      </loader>
>    </os>
>    <cpu>
> -    <mode name='host-passthrough' supported='no'/>
> +    <mode name='host-passthrough' supported='yes'/>
>      <mode name='host-model' supported='yes'>
>        <model fallback='allow'>POWER8</model>
>      </mode>
>      <mode name='custom' supported='yes'>
>        <model usable='unknown'>POWER8</model>
>        <model usable='unknown'>POWER7</model>
> +      <model usable='unknown'>POWER8</model>

Oh, I forgot to mention that the two POWER8 models here really come from
QEMU. The bug is already reported:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1396536

Jirka