[libvirt] [PATCH rfc v2 0/8] fspool: backend directory

[Maxim Nestratov]

23-Sep-16 23:51, John Ferlan пишет:

[snip]
> I think rather than just copy what the storage pool does, I would think
> the new driver could "build up" what it needs based on some consensus
> based on what makes sense for the usage model.
>
>
>>> Having a guest mount a host file system would seem to be possible
>>> through other means. I also start wondering about security implications
>>> for either side (haven't put too much thought into it). What can the
>>> guest put "on" the host file system and vice versa where different
>>> security policies may exist for allowing such placement.
>>>
>>> Perhaps rather than a large dump of code the RFC should state the goal,
>>> purpose, usage, etc. and see if that's what the community wants or is
>>> willing to provide feedback on.
>> This was previously done in the mailing list many months ago now.
>>
> Well a pointer would have been nice... Obviously I didn't remember it!
> There was an fspools v1 posted 8/19. I think there was an assumption
> that list readers/reviewers would remember some original RFC. I didn't.
> I've just been going through older patches that haven't had review and
> this just came up as "next" (actually I had started thinking about the
> v1 when v2 showed up).
>
> John
>

Just a pointer to the previous disscussion:

https://www.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/2016-April/msg01941.html
https://www.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/2016-May/msg00208.html

Maxim