[libvirt] [PATCH 2/3] interface: Introduce virInterfaceObjGetNames

Michal Privoznik mprivozn at redhat.com
Mon Apr 10 08:11:19 UTC 2017


On 04/06/2017 04:08 PM, John Ferlan wrote:
> Unlike other drivers, this is a test driver only API. Still combining
> the logic of testConnectListInterfaces and testConnectListDefinedInterfaces
> makes things a bit easier in the long run.
>
> Signed-off-by: John Ferlan <jferlan at redhat.com>
> ---
>  src/conf/virinterfaceobj.c | 34 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  src/conf/virinterfaceobj.h |  6 ++++++
>  src/libvirt_private.syms   |  1 +
>  src/test/test_driver.c     | 54 +++++++++++-----------------------------------
>  4 files changed, 53 insertions(+), 42 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/src/conf/virinterfaceobj.c b/src/conf/virinterfaceobj.c
> index 0407c1f..229226a 100644
> --- a/src/conf/virinterfaceobj.c
> +++ b/src/conf/virinterfaceobj.c
> @@ -235,3 +235,37 @@ virInterfaceObjNumOfInterfaces(virInterfaceObjListPtr interfaces,
>
>      return ninterfaces;
>  }
> +
> +
> +int
> +virInterfaceObjGetNames(virInterfaceObjListPtr interfaces,
> +                        bool wantActive,
> +                        char **const names,
> +                        int maxnames)
> +{
> +    int nnames = 0;
> +    size_t i;
> +
> +    for (i = 0; i < interfaces->count && nnames < maxnames; i++) {
> +        virInterfaceObjPtr obj = interfaces->objs[i];
> +        virInterfaceObjLock(obj);
> +        if ((wantActive && virInterfaceObjIsActive(obj)) ||
> +            (!wantActive && !virInterfaceObjIsActive(obj))) {

Again. if (wantActive == virInterfaceObjIsActive()) ...

> +            if (VIR_STRDUP(names[nnames], obj->def->name) < 0) {
> +                virInterfaceObjUnlock(obj);
> +                goto failure;
> +            }
> +            nnames++;
> +        }
> +        virInterfaceObjUnlock(obj);
> +    }
> +
> +    return nnames;
> +
> + failure:
> +    while (--nnames >= 0)
> +        VIR_FREE(names[nnames]);
> +    memset(names, 0, maxnames * sizeof(*names));

This isn't necessary. Firstly, VIR_FREE() already sets all those items 
in the array we've touched to zero. Secondly, the callers already clear 
our the array (even those items we haven't touched). But mostly, in 
general, if an error is returned, callers should not rely on anything 
else that is returned. For instance, should virStrToLong_*(s, &ret, 
base, &result) return -1, the @result is undefined.

> +
> +    return -1;
> +}
> diff --git a/src/conf/virinterfaceobj.h b/src/conf/virinterfaceobj.h
> index 2f07174..5b0527d 100644
> --- a/src/conf/virinterfaceobj.h
> +++ b/src/conf/virinterfaceobj.h
> @@ -85,4 +85,10 @@ int
>  virInterfaceObjNumOfInterfaces(virInterfaceObjListPtr interfaces,
>                                 bool wantActive);
>
> +int
> +virInterfaceObjGetNames(virInterfaceObjListPtr interfaces,
> +                        bool wantActive,
> +                        char **const names,
> +                        int maxnames);
> +
>  #endif /* __VIRINTERFACEOBJ_H__ */
> diff --git a/src/libvirt_private.syms b/src/libvirt_private.syms
> index 96aacaa..88e530c 100644
> --- a/src/libvirt_private.syms
> +++ b/src/libvirt_private.syms
> @@ -935,6 +935,7 @@ virDomainObjListRename;
>  virInterfaceObjAssignDef;
>  virInterfaceObjFindByMACString;
>  virInterfaceObjFindByName;
> +virInterfaceObjGetNames;
>  virInterfaceObjListClone;
>  virInterfaceObjListFree;
>  virInterfaceObjLock;
> diff --git a/src/test/test_driver.c b/src/test/test_driver.c
> index 6910681..4e10eb2 100644
> --- a/src/test/test_driver.c
> +++ b/src/test/test_driver.c
> @@ -3657,33 +3657,18 @@ static int testConnectNumOfInterfaces(virConnectPtr conn)
>      return ninterfaces;
>  }
>
> -static int testConnectListInterfaces(virConnectPtr conn, char **const names, int nnames)
> +static int testConnectListInterfaces(virConnectPtr conn, char **const names, int maxnames)
>  {
>      testDriverPtr privconn = conn->privateData;
> -    int n = 0;
> -    size_t i;
> +    int nnames;
> +
> +    memset(names, 0, maxnames * sizeof(*names));

I don't think this is necessary either, but I don't care that much.

>
>      testDriverLock(privconn);
> -    memset(names, 0, sizeof(*names)*nnames);
> -    for (i = 0; (i < privconn->ifaces.count) && (n < nnames); i++) {
> -        virInterfaceObjLock(privconn->ifaces.objs[i]);
> -        if (virInterfaceObjIsActive(privconn->ifaces.objs[i])) {
> -            if (VIR_STRDUP(names[n++], privconn->ifaces.objs[i]->def->name) < 0) {
> -                virInterfaceObjUnlock(privconn->ifaces.objs[i]);
> -                goto error;
> -            }
> -        }
> -        virInterfaceObjUnlock(privconn->ifaces.objs[i]);
> -    }
> +    nnames = virInterfaceObjGetNames(&privconn->ifaces, true, names, maxnames);
>      testDriverUnlock(privconn);
>
> -    return n;
> -
> - error:
> -    for (n = 0; n < nnames; n++)
> -        VIR_FREE(names[n]);
> -    testDriverUnlock(privconn);
> -    return -1;
> +    return nnames;

ACK

Michal




More information about the libvir-list mailing list