[libvirt] [PATCH] news: document libxl tunnelled migration support

[Jim Fehlig]

On 02/15/2017 05:06 PM, Joao Martins wrote:
> On 02/15/2017 11:41 PM, Jim Fehlig wrote:
>> Joao Martins wrote:
>>> Signed-off-by: Joao Martins <joao.m.martins at oracle.com>
>>> ---
>>>  docs/news.xml | 10 ++++++++++
>>>  1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/docs/news.xml b/docs/news.xml
>>> index b756a97..b0629b5 100644
>>> --- a/docs/news.xml
>>> +++ b/docs/news.xml
>>> @@ -53,6 +53,16 @@
>>>            was <code>virtio-net</code>.
>>>          </description>
>>>        </change>
>>> +      <change>
>>> +        <summary>
>>> +          libxl: add tunnelled migration support
>>> +        </summary>
>>> +        <description>
>>> +          Add tunnelled migration to libxl driver, which is always capable of
>>> +          strong encryption and doesn't require any extra network connection
>>> +          other than what's required for remote access of libvirtd.
>>> +        </description>
>>> +      </change>
>>>      </section>
>>>      <section title="Improvements">
>>>        <change>
>>
>> Pushed, but only after realizing tunneled is misspelled :-(. No use perpetuating
>> the misspelling of tunneled, so I've pushed a trivial followup.
>
> Interesting, I didn't know that. Greping the whole repo for "tunnelled" and you
> will find a *lot* of matches:
>
> $ git grep tunneled | wc -l
> 10
> $ git grep tunnelled | wc -l
> 1242

So the incorrect spelling is used over 100x more than the correct one :-)

> Hmm, but the internets aren't really clear. Some hits say tunneled vs tunnelled
> being both correct.

Heh, as a native speaker I'm not sure which spelling is correct, but seem to 
recall a prior discussion on the list proclaiming 'tunneled'. If folks prefer I 
can revert the s/tunnelled/tunneled/ commit.

Regards,
Jim