[libvirt] [PATCH v2 04/33] domaincapstest: Add test data for QEMU 2.9.0
John Ferlan
jferlan at redhat.com
Wed Feb 22 12:11:03 UTC 2017
On 02/22/2017 04:06 AM, Jiri Denemark wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 09:23:34 -0500, John Ferlan wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 02/15/2017 11:44 AM, Jiri Denemark wrote:
>>> Signed-off-by: Jiri Denemark <jdenemar at redhat.com>
>>> ---
>>>
>>> Notes:
>>> Version 2:
>>> - no change
>>>
>>> .../domaincapsschemadata/qemu_2.9.0-tcg.x86_64.xml | 116 +++++++++++++++++++++
>>> tests/domaincapsschemadata/qemu_2.9.0.x86_64.xml | 116 +++++++++++++++++++++
>>> tests/domaincapstest.c | 8 ++
>>> 3 files changed, 240 insertions(+)
>>> create mode 100644 tests/domaincapsschemadata/qemu_2.9.0-tcg.x86_64.xml
>>> create mode 100644 tests/domaincapsschemadata/qemu_2.9.0.x86_64.xml
>>>
>>
>> Will this "eventually" need an updated when qemu 2.9 is complete? Or is
>> it "close enough"?
>
> Probably not, but we can't tell until 2.9 is complete :-)
>
>>> diff --git a/tests/domaincapstest.c b/tests/domaincapstest.c
>>> index 28d8609ac..9b64f2c18 100644
>>> --- a/tests/domaincapstest.c
>>> +++ b/tests/domaincapstest.c
>>> @@ -453,6 +453,14 @@ mymain(void)
>>> "/usr/bin/qemu-system-x86_64", NULL,
>>> "x86_64", VIR_DOMAIN_VIRT_QEMU);
>>>
>>> + DO_TEST_QEMU("2.9.0", "caps_2.9.0",
>>> + "/usr/bin/qemu-system-x86_64", NULL,
>>> + "x86_64", VIR_DOMAIN_VIRT_KVM);
>>> +
>>> + DO_TEST_QEMU("2.9.0-tcg", "caps_2.9.0",
>>> + "/usr/bin/qemu-system-x86_64", NULL,
>>> + "x86_64", VIR_DOMAIN_VIRT_QEMU);
>>> +
>>> DO_TEST_QEMU("2.7.0", "caps_2.7.0",
>>> "/usr/bin/qemu-system-s390x", NULL,
>>> "s390x", VIR_DOMAIN_VIRT_KVM);
>>
>> What about "s390x" for 2.9.0? Since later patches seem to make some
>> alterations for s390...
>
> s390 provides the required functionality since 2.8.0, thus we already
> have the test data in place.
>
>> Unrelated to this patch question - should these always be updated for
>> each cpu type for each release?
>
> I don't think we need to always update all of them at once. I tend to
> add test data for things we want to test which are not present in
> existing data sets.
>
> Jirka
>
OK - ACK for this one too then.
John
More information about the libvir-list
mailing list