[libvirt] [PATCH] news: document libxl tunnelled migration support

Jim Fehlig jfehlig at suse.com
Thu Feb 16 02:59:09 UTC 2017


On 02/15/2017 06:35 PM, Chris Lalancette wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 8:24 PM, Jim Fehlig <jfehlig at suse.com
> <mailto:jfehlig at suse.com>> wrote:
>
>
>     Heh, as a native speaker I'm not sure which spelling is correct, but seem to
>     recall a prior discussion on the list proclaiming 'tunneled'. If folks
>     prefer I can revert the s/tunnelled/tunneled/ commit.
>
>
> I think you have me to blame for "tunnelled".  At the time I initially wrote
> tunnelled migration support, I did a Google search similar to what you have
> done, and determined that tunnelled seemed to be slightly preferred.
> Subsequently almost everyone has balked at it, but I think the horse has left
> the barn on it and we should probably stick with "tunnelled".

Ok. I also failed to realize that the commit providing the news item used 
'tunnelled'. I've sent a patch to revert the spelling change, but I'll wait for 
an explicit ACK this time

https://www.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/2017-February/msg00770.html

Regards,
Jim




More information about the libvir-list mailing list