[libvirt] [PATCH v3 0/9] Multiple cleanups within interfaceobj and interface driver

[John Ferlan]

On 05/30/2017 06:43 AM, John Ferlan wrote:
> v2: https://www.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/2017-May/msg01059.html
> v1: https://www.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/2017-April/msg01225.html
> 
> Patches 1-7 were acked in v1 with a request to "show" the next step in
> a 9/8 patch to convert to using virObject for virInterfaceObj.  v2 added
> that, but also added a couple of patches that were unfavorable.
> 
> Since I didn't want to push something partial and it was later in the
> release cycle, I didn't push 1-7. This series keeps the v1 patch 8 in
> tact and adds patch9 which does the virObject conversion and the
> virInterfaceObjEndAPI in the same patch (v2 separated those, but it seeems
> Peter wasn't favoring that option, so I combined them).
> 
> I know this is not 3.4 material, but with a successful review of 8 & 9,
> I would push this after 3.4 is cut.
> 
> John Ferlan (9):
>   interface: Consistently use 'obj' for a virInterfaceObjPtr
>   interface: Remove some unnecessary goto's for Interface tests
>   interface: Use virInterfaceDefPtr rather than deref from
>     virInterfaceObjPtr
>   interface: Make _virInterfaceObj struct private
>   interface: Make _virInterfaceObjList struct private
>   interface: Rename some virInterfaceObj* API's
>   interface: Clean up virInterfaceObjListFindByMACString
>   interface: Introduce virInterfaceObjNew
>   interface: Convert virInterfaceObj to use virObjectLockable
> 
>  po/POTFILES.in             |   1 -
>  src/conf/virinterfaceobj.c | 275 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------
>  src/conf/virinterfaceobj.h |  72 ++++++------
>  src/libvirt_private.syms   |  19 ++--
>  src/test/test_driver.c     | 142 ++++++++++++-----------
>  5 files changed, 292 insertions(+), 217 deletions(-)
> 

Based on ACK in v1 (and now that 3.4.0 is out the door), I've pushed the
first 7 patches. Although 8-9 were essentially ACK'd - while working
through the other vir*obj.c modules (nwfilter, secret, and nodedev) I
realized I'd missed a step between 8 and 9 as well a potential leak of
the object, so I'll resend 3 as a v4 series shortly.

John