[libvirt] [PATCH 1/6] bhyve: virBhyveProbeCaps: BHYVE_CAP_LPC_BOOTROM

[Fabian Freyer]

On 08.03.2017 18:19, Michal Privoznik wrote:
> ACK, but we really need a better way to detect capabilites. For instance
> now, bhyve binary is executed 4 times just to find out whether it
> supports 4 capabilities. That's just madness. Maybe we can get in touch
> with bhyve developers and ask them? Maybe it could have a monitor just
> like qemu has, or something.
There's a patch[1] for it, but it would need to be moved along.
Unfortunately, we would still need to somehow fall back to this for
backwards compatibility...

Fabian

 [1] https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=210111
-- 
A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
A: Top-posting.
Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail?