[libvirt] [BUG] mlock support breakage

Luiz Capitulino lcapitulino at redhat.com
Mon Mar 13 18:08:30 UTC 2017


On Mon, 13 Mar 2017 13:53:33 -0400
Luiz Capitulino <lcapitulino at redhat.com> wrote:

> OK, you're right. I personally don't like we're putting a random cap
> on QEMU memory allocations, but if it's large enough it shouldn't be
> a problem (I hope).

The I hope part meaning, if we do find legitimate reasons for QEMU's
address space to go beyond $LARGE_NUMBER, it will be means of guests
randomly crashing when using <locked/>.




More information about the libvir-list mailing list