[libvirt] [PATCH 00/13] Make the virNodeDeviceObjPtr private

John Ferlan jferlan at redhat.com
Wed May 24 13:59:38 UTC 2017

On 05/23/2017 04:26 AM, Bjoern Walk wrote:
> John Ferlan <jferlan at redhat.com> [2017-05-19, 09:08AM -0400]:
>> All part of the effort I have to have a common object model. This series
>> is node device test, driver, and virnodedevobj related.
>> There's also a couple of bug fixes at the beginning of the series from
>> things I have found during this effort.
>> There's still a few more patches in local branches to make the
>> virNodeDeviceObjListPtr private as well, but those have some merge
>> needs with other patches currently on list elsewhere, so I'll hold
>> onto them for now.
> Am I missing something or where does the privatization actually happen?

Yeah about 5 or so more patches - bad subject for the cover letter then.
The "issue" is that the "next" patch in the series deals with
virNodeDeviceObjList and that required a test_driver change. Because the
patches in my local branch build upon others and changes in other
patches have conflicts with a test_driver.c change to _testDriver...

> In general, a lot of the cleanups you are performing are beneficial for
> the readability. My biggest concern is that this will generate a lot of
> work when backporting patches.

Think I already addressed this in patch 4 response.


More information about the libvir-list mailing list