[libvirt] [PATCH] test-wrap-argv.pl: Accept short parameter -i for --in-place

[Pavel Hrdina]

On Fri, May 12, 2017 at 04:32:15PM +0200, Martin Kletzander wrote:
> On Fri, May 12, 2017 at 04:12:06PM +0200, Pavel Hrdina wrote:
> >On Fri, May 12, 2017 at 03:59:46PM +0200, Martin Kletzander wrote:
> >> On Fri, May 12, 2017 at 03:15:58PM +0200, Pavel Hrdina wrote:
> >> >On Fri, May 12, 2017 at 03:11:27PM +0200, Martin Kletzander wrote:
> >> >> I like to use it that way and every time I try running it I just
> >> >> instinctively use '-i' (like with sed, etc.) and it makes sense, IMHO.
> >> >>
> >> >> Signed-off-by: Martin Kletzander <mkletzan at redhat.com>
> >> >> ---
> >> >>  tests/test-wrap-argv.pl | 2 +-
> >> >>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >> >
> >> >Reviewed-by: Pavel Hrdina <phrdina at redhat.com>
> >>
> >> Does that mean ACK?
> >
> >https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/submitting-patches.html#reviewer-s-statement-of-oversight
> >
> >s/kernel/libvirt/ for the text
> >
> 
> Honestly, I didn't know there is also definition of other -by:'s, I
> probably read those docs back when there was just Signed-of-by
> definition.  So thanks for new info ;)  Anyway, do we have some
> documentation about libvirt using these tags as well?  I only remember
> talking about S-o-b being "preferred", not even required.  Any news on
> that front?  BTW: I'll push this in a while.

No there is no documentation yet and nothing is required.  I just like
the idea of using Signed-of-by, Reviewed-by, Tested-by and Reported-by
tags :) .

Pavel
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/attachments/20170512/b99726a3/attachment-0001.sig>