[libvirt] [PATCH] conf: duplicate interface name instead of MAC provided to lookup the interface
Pavel Hrdina
phrdina at redhat.com
Fri Oct 20 14:28:28 UTC 2017
On Fri, Oct 20, 2017 at 04:25:13PM +0200, Andrea Bolognani wrote:
> On Fri, 2017-10-20 at 16:07 +0200, Pavel Hrdina wrote:
> > Introduced by 6094d6ec7fc9ea3e28c18c880b76858f06a8b129.
> > Found by running libvirt-perl tests.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Pavel Hrdina <phrdina at redhat.com>
> > ---
> > src/conf/virinterfaceobj.c | 2 +-
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/src/conf/virinterfaceobj.c b/src/conf/virinterfaceobj.c
> > index a6814a6aee..21d76e7507 100644
> > --- a/src/conf/virinterfaceobj.c
> > +++ b/src/conf/virinterfaceobj.c
> > @@ -182,7 +182,7 @@ virInterfaceObjListFindByMACStringCb(void *payload,
> > virObjectLock(obj);
> >
> > if (STRCASEEQ(obj->def->mac, data->matchStr)) {
> > - if (VIR_STRDUP(data->macs[data->nmacs], data->matchStr) < 0) {
> > + if (VIR_STRDUP(data->macs[data->nmacs], obj->def->name) < 0) {
> > data->error = true;
> > goto cleanup;
> > }
>
> Reviewed-by: Andrea Bolognani <abologna at redhat.com>
Thanks
> As an aside, I think 'macs' is a pretty bad name for the array, since
> we're not storing MAC addresses but rather interface names, so using
> either 'matches' or 'names' would be much better IMHO. Do you want me
> to send a follow-up patch performing the rename?
That would be good idea, feel free to send it and probably push it as
trivial.
Pavel
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/attachments/20171020/8e00c418/attachment-0001.sig>
More information about the libvir-list
mailing list