[libvirt] [jenkins-ci PATCH v2 3/6] projects: Add libvirt-master-website job

[Andrea Bolognani]

On Tue, 2018-04-17 at 15:02 +0100, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 17, 2018 at 03:57:04PM +0200, Andrea Bolognani wrote:
> > We could go one further and use
> > 
> >   name: '{name}-{branch}-build{variant}'
> > 
> > for the generic-build-job template and
> > 
> >   variant: +website
> > 
> > for this specific job, then change the autotools-mingw-job
> > template to use
> > 
> >   name: '{name}-{branch}-build+mingw'
> > 
> > to align the job names with the project names at the Ansible
> > level.
> 
> Yes, that would be reasonable, though I prefer '-' rather than '+',
> since we're already using '-' to separate the first three terms
> that make up the job name - no reason why the variant should be
> treated differently in the naming scheme.

I went for '+' in the Ansible part because using '-' would
introduce ambiguity: is 'libvirt-mingw' a variant of libvirt, or
just a completely different project like 'libvirt-dbus'?

In the case of Jenkins jobs, we have already lost that battle
thanks to jobs like virt-manager-master-build, so I guess it's
okay to keep using '-' :)

> > We could then even think about dropping autotools-mingw-job
> > altogether and instead use generic-build-job there as well,
> > like
> > 
> >   - project:
> >       name: libvirt
> >       jobs:
> >         - generic-build-job:
> >             variant: +mingw
> >             command: '{mingw_build}'
> > 
> > where 'mingw_build' would be defined globally.
> 
> I don't think that's desirable as {mingw_build} ends up duplicating
> the shell commands defined by the autotools-build-job template.
> 
> Instead we shoudl make use of existing parameterization of the
> existing autotools template
> 
>    - project:
>        name: libvirt
>        jobs:
>          - autotools-build-job:
>              variant: +mingw
>              local_env: {mingw32_env}
>              autogen_args: {mingw32_autogen}
> 
> With
> 
>   mingw32_env: |
>               export PKG_CONFIG_LIBDIR="/usr/i686-w64-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/pkgconfig:/usr/i686-w64-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/pkgconfig"
>           export PKG_CONFIG_PATH="$VIRT_PREFIX/i686-w64-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/pkgconfig" \
>           export PREFIX=$VIRT_PREFIX/i686-w64-mingw32/sys-root/mingw
> 
>   mingw32_autogen: --host=i686-w64-mingw32

Yeah, that looks good too.

It'll lead to having separate -mingw32 and -mingw64 jobs, though:
personally I don't have a problem with that, just making sure you
don't either.

-- 
Andrea Bolognani / Red Hat / Virtualization