[libvirt] [Qemu-devel] [qemu RFC v3 2/3] qapi: change the type of TargetInfo.arch from string to enum SysEmuTarget

[Markus Armbruster]

Laszlo Ersek <lersek at redhat.com> writes:

> On 04/23/18 11:50, Markus Armbruster wrote:
>> Laszlo Ersek <lersek at redhat.com> writes:
>> 
>>> Now that we have @SysEmuTarget, it makes sense to restict
>>> @TargetInfo. at arch to valid sysemu targets at the schema level.
>> 
>> We could mention that supported targets become visible in QMP
>> introspection.  But I can't see what QMP clients could do with this
>> information, so let's not bother.
>> 
>>>
>>> Cc: "Daniel P. Berrange" <berrange at redhat.com>
>>> Cc: David Gibson <dgibson at redhat.com>
>>> Cc: Eric Blake <eblake at redhat.com>
>>> Cc: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel at redhat.com>
>>> Cc: Kashyap Chamarthy <kchamart at redhat.com>
>>> Cc: Markus Armbruster <armbru at redhat.com>
>>> Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini at redhat.com>
>>> Cc: Thomas Huth <thuth at redhat.com>
>>> Signed-off-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek at redhat.com>
>>> ---
>>>
>>> Notes:
>>>     RFCv3:
>>>     
>>>     - The patch is new in this version. [Markus]
>>>
>>>  qapi/misc.json |  6 ++++--
>>>  arch_init.c    | 18 +++++++++++++++++-
>>>  2 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/qapi/misc.json b/qapi/misc.json
>>> index 5636f4a14997..3b4fbc534089 100644
>>> --- a/qapi/misc.json
>>> +++ b/qapi/misc.json
>>> @@ -5,6 +5,8 @@
>>>  # = Miscellanea
>>>  ##
>>>  
>>> +{ 'include': 'common.json' }
>>> +
>>>  ##
>>>  # @qmp_capabilities:
>>>  #
>>> @@ -2449,12 +2451,12 @@
>>>  #
>>>  # Information describing the QEMU target.
>>>  #
>>> -# @arch: the target architecture (eg "x86_64", "i386", etc)
>>> +# @arch: the target architecture
>>>  #
>>>  # Since: 1.2.0
>>>  ##
>>>  { 'struct': 'TargetInfo',
>>> -  'data': { 'arch': 'str' } }
>>> +  'data': { 'arch': 'SysEmuTarget' } }
>>>  
>>>  ##
>>>  # @query-target:
>>> diff --git a/arch_init.c b/arch_init.c
>>> index 6ee07478bd11..4367f30291f8 100644
>>> --- a/arch_init.c
>>> +++ b/arch_init.c
>>> @@ -29,6 +29,7 @@
>>>  #include "hw/pci/pci.h"
>>>  #include "hw/audio/soundhw.h"
>>>  #include "qapi/qapi-commands-misc.h"
>>> +#include "qapi/error.h"
>>>  #include "qemu/config-file.h"
>>>  #include "qemu/error-report.h"
>>>  #include "hw/acpi/acpi.h"
>>> @@ -111,8 +112,23 @@ int xen_available(void)
>>>  TargetInfo *qmp_query_target(Error **errp)
>>>  {
>>>      TargetInfo *info = g_malloc0(sizeof(*info));
>>> +    Error *local_err = NULL;
>>>  
>>> -    info->arch = g_strdup(TARGET_NAME);
>>> +    /*
>>> +     * The fallback enum value is irrelevant here (TARGET_NAME is a
>>> +     * macro and can never be NULL), so simply pass zero. Also, the
>> 
>> We pass -1 in similar cases elsewhere.
>> 
>>> +     * lookup should never fail -- if it fails, then @SysEmuTarget needs
>>> +     * extending. Catch that with an assertion, but also handle it
>>> +     * gracefully, in case someone adventurous disables assertions.
>>> +     */
>>> +    info->arch = qapi_enum_parse(&SysEmuTarget_lookup, TARGET_NAME, 0,
>>> +                                 &local_err);
>>> +    g_assert(!local_err);
>>> +    if (local_err) {
>>> +        error_propagate(errp, local_err);
>>> +        qapi_free_TargetInfo(info);
>>> +        return NULL;
>>> +    }
>> 
>> Simpler:
>> 
>>        info->arch = qapi_enum_parse(&SysEmuTarget_lookup, TARGET_NAME, 0,
>>                                     &error_abort);
>
> OK, I'll use this form -- but should I use -1 or 0, after all, for
> default value?

I count more than a dozen instances of -1, and none of zero.  Please use
-1.