[libvirt] [PATCH rust] git: add config file telling git-publish how to send patches

Ján Tomko jtomko at redhat.com
Tue Apr 24 15:05:29 UTC 2018


On Mon, Apr 23, 2018 at 02:32:11PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
>On Mon, Apr 23, 2018 at 03:20:53PM +0200, Ján Tomko wrote:
>> I found the reverse order, i.e.
>> 'rust PATCH'
>> to be both nicer and more useful. (not to mention more common)
>>
>> For example, in some downstream lists I use a simple text match
>> against 'libvirt PATCH', which also catches any subsequent version
>
>I'm not really seeing why it would make any functional difference
>to ability to match subjects.
>

I assume in v2 it would become 'PATCHv2 libvirt', which does not contain
the 'PATCH libvirt' string, unlike 'libvirt PATCHv2' and 'libvirt
PATCH'

Jano
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/attachments/20180424/2b58a080/attachment-0001.sig>


More information about the libvir-list mailing list