[libvirt] [PATCH v2 3/7] lock_driver.h: Introduce metadata flag

Daniel P. Berrangé berrange at redhat.com
Mon Aug 20 14:46:41 UTC 2018


On Mon, Aug 20, 2018 at 09:25:18AM +0200, Michal Prívozník wrote:
> On 08/17/2018 12:24 AM, John Ferlan wrote:
> > 
> > 
> > On 08/14/2018 07:19 AM, Michal Privoznik wrote:
> >> Signed-off-by: Michal Privoznik <mprivozn at redhat.com>
> >> ---
> >>  src/locking/lock_driver.h | 2 ++
> >>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/src/locking/lock_driver.h b/src/locking/lock_driver.h
> >> index 8b7cccc521..7c8f79520a 100644
> >> --- a/src/locking/lock_driver.h
> >> +++ b/src/locking/lock_driver.h
> >> @@ -56,6 +56,8 @@ typedef enum {
> >>      VIR_LOCK_MANAGER_RESOURCE_READONLY = (1 << 0),
> >>      /* The resource is assigned in shared, writable mode */
> >>      VIR_LOCK_MANAGER_RESOURCE_SHARED   = (1 << 1),
> >> +    /* The resource is locked for metadata change */
> >> +    VIR_LOCK_MANAGER_RESOURCE_METADATA = (1 << 2),
> > 
> > Does this work or make sense for lease type?
> 
> That's the thing. You're right, it doesn't make sense for lease type.
> But on the level of RPC of virtlockd both leases and disks kind of blend
> together. I mean, virtlockd is merely told to lock this or that file.

That's ok.   The way I look at it the domain XML describes various
resources, disks, leases, etc.  The virtlockd daemon provides a
generic mechanism for acquiring locks.  We just happen to map leases
onto the default lock type. Here we're adding a 2nd lock type and do
not require any mapping from leases.


Regards,
Daniel
-- 
|: https://berrange.com      -o-    https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :|
|: https://libvirt.org         -o-            https://fstop138.berrange.com :|
|: https://entangle-photo.org    -o-    https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :|




More information about the libvir-list mailing list