[libvirt] [Qemu-devel] [RFC 0/2] Attempt to implement the standby feature for assigned network devices
Michael S. Tsirkin
mst at redhat.com
Wed Dec 5 17:22:18 UTC 2018
On Wed, Dec 05, 2018 at 06:09:16PM +0100, Peter Krempa wrote:
> From managements point of view, bundling all this together is really not
> a good idea since it creates a very big matrix of failure scenarios.
I think this is clear. This is why we are doing it in QEMU where we can
actually do all the rollbacks transparently.
> general even libvirt will prefer that upper layer management drives this
> externally, since any rolback scenario will result in a policy decision
> of what to do in certain cases, and what timeouts to pick.
Architectural ugliness of implementing what is from users perspective a
mechanism and not a policy aside, experience teaches that this isn't
going to happen. People have been talking about the idea of doing
this at the upper layers for years.
More information about the libvir-list