[libvirt] Should we switch to a different JSON library?
Pino Toscano
ptoscano at redhat.com
Mon Feb 12 13:38:02 UTC 2018
On Tuesday, 7 November 2017 14:05:25 CET Martin Kletzander wrote:
> - Jansson [3] - I really like this one. The API seems very intuitive,
> it has nice documentation [4] in readthedocs (and I'm
> not talking about the visual style, but how easy is to
> find information), it can be used for formatting JSON
> in a similar way we are doing it. It has json_auto_t
> (optional) type that uses the attribute cleanup for
> automatic scope dereference (just in case we want to
> use it), it has iterators... did I tell you I like this
> one a lot?
>
> What do you (others) think of switching the JSON library? Do you know
> about any other projects that could be used considering license,
> platform support, etc.? Also feel free to fix any mistakes I might have
> posted. I double-checked it, but you know, "trust, but verify".
FYI: libguestfs just switched to Jansson [1], so any version starting
from 1.39.1 will use it instead of Yajl. In case of libguestfs, yajl
was used directly, without wrappers of any sort, and the switch was
straightforward.
[1] https://github.com/libguestfs/libguestfs/commit/bd1c5c9f4dcf38458099db8a0bf4659a07ef055d
--
Pino Toscano
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/attachments/20180212/b983b871/attachment-0001.sig>
More information about the libvir-list
mailing list