[libvirt] [PATCH 02/15] conf: nodedev: Rename virNodeDeviceCapMatch to virNodeDevObjHasCap

[Erik Skultety]

On Fri, Jan 26, 2018 at 12:40:46PM +0100, Michal Privoznik wrote:
> On 01/25/2018 10:23 AM, Erik Skultety wrote:
> > We currently have 2 methods that do the capability matching. This should
> > be condensed to a single function and all the derivates should just call
> > into that using a proper type conversion.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Erik Skultety <eskultet at redhat.com>
> > ---
> >  src/conf/virnodedeviceobj.c | 8 +++++---
> >  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/src/conf/virnodedeviceobj.c b/src/conf/virnodedeviceobj.c
> > index a4d38b3a1..ccad59a4b 100644
> > --- a/src/conf/virnodedeviceobj.c
> > +++ b/src/conf/virnodedeviceobj.c
> > @@ -55,6 +55,8 @@ static void virNodeDeviceObjDispose(void *opaque);
> >  static void virNodeDeviceObjListDispose(void *opaque);
> >  static bool virNodeDeviceObjHasCapStr(const virNodeDeviceObj *obj,
> >                                        const char *cap);
> > +static bool virNodeDeviceObjHasCap(const virNodeDeviceObj *obj,
> > +                                   int type);
> >
>
> Again, I'm failing to see why the forward declaration is needed. ACk to
> the rest.

I can drop the one from patch 1 that one is really not needed, but dropping this
one would cause the compilation to fail on patch 3. Now, sure I could very
easily solve this by moving the function up, but I originally decided to go this
way rather than creating 2 large hunks just because of the function move. Let
me know whether you'd prefer to see the function to be moved or you're fine
with the forward decl. in this case.

Erik