[libvirt] [PATCH 2/2] docs: formatdomain: clarify period cputune subelement

Fabiano Fidêncio fabiano at fidencio.org
Tue Jul 17 16:01:50 UTC 2018


On Tue, Jul 17, 2018 at 5:47 PM, Katerina Koukiou <kkoukiou at redhat.com> wrote:
> Although the name of the element is not self-explanatory,
> it's affecting only the vcpu threads.
>
> Signed-off-by: Katerina Koukiou <kkoukiou at redhat.com>
> ---
>  docs/formatdomain.html.in | 10 +++++-----
>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/docs/formatdomain.html.in b/docs/formatdomain.html.in
> index 7fa448acdc..61930e4907 100644
> --- a/docs/formatdomain.html.in
> +++ b/docs/formatdomain.html.in
> @@ -831,11 +831,11 @@
>        <dd>
>          The optional <code>quota</code> element specifies the maximum allowed
>          bandwidth(unit: microseconds). A domain with <code>quota</code> as any
> -        negative value indicates that the domain has infinite bandwidth, which
> -        means that it is not bandwidth controlled. The value should be in range
> -        [1000, 18446744073709551] or less than 0. A quota with value 0 means no
> -        value. You can use this feature to ensure that all vcpus run at the same
> -        speed.
> +        negative value indicates that the domain has infinite bandwidth for
> +        VCPU threads, which means that it is not bandwidth controlled. The value

Just a nitpick here.
I'd go for vCPU instead of VCPU.

I know both terms are used, it's just that vCPU seems to be used more
often than VCPU:
[ffidenci at pessoa libvirt]$ grep --color "vCPU" docs/formatdomain.html.in | wc -l
10
[ffidenci at pessoa libvirt]$ grep --color "VCPU" docs/formatdomain.html.in | wc -l
5

I'd follow up with an additional patch just to standardize the name
for the most used one.

> +        should be in range [1000, 18446744073709551] or less than 0. A quota
> +        with value 0 means no value. You can use this feature to ensure that all
> +        vcpus run at the same speed.
>          <span class="since">Only QEMU driver support since 0.9.4, LXC since
>          0.9.10</span>
>        </dd>
> --
> 2.17.1
>
> --
> libvir-list mailing list
> libvir-list at redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list


Best Regards,
-- 
Fabiano Fidêncio




More information about the libvir-list mailing list