[libvirt] [PATCH 6/9] conf: Rename cachetune to restune

Wang, Huaqiang huaqiang.wang at intel.com
Thu Jul 26 17:21:54 UTC 2018



> -----Original Message-----
> From: John Ferlan [mailto:jferlan at redhat.com]
> Sent: Friday, July 27, 2018 12:33 AM
> To: Niu, Bing <bing.niu at intel.com>; libvir-list at redhat.com
> Cc: Feng, Shaohe <shaohe.feng at intel.com>; Wang, Huaqiang
> <huaqiang.wang at intel.com>; Ding, Jian-feng <jian-feng.ding at intel.com>;
> rui.zang at yandex.com
> Subject: Re: [libvirt] [PATCH 6/9] conf: Rename cachetune to restune
> 
> 
> 
> On 07/18/2018 03:57 AM, bing.niu at intel.com wrote:
> > From: Bing Niu <bing.niu at intel.com>
> >
> > Resctrl not only supports cache tuning, but also memory bandwidth
> > tuning. Renaming cachetune to restune(resource tuning) to reflect
> > that. With restune, all allocation for different resources (cache,
> > memory bandwidth) are aggregated and represented by a
> > virResctrlAllocPtr inside virDomainRestuneDef.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Bing Niu <bing.niu at intel.com>
> > ---
> >  src/conf/domain_conf.c  | 44
> > ++++++++++++++++++++++----------------------
> >  src/conf/domain_conf.h  | 10 +++++-----  src/qemu/qemu_domain.c  |  2
> > +-  src/qemu/qemu_process.c | 18 +++++++++---------
> >  4 files changed, 37 insertions(+), 37 deletions(-)
> >
> 
> As I noted previously, not much a fan of Restune instead of Cachetune, but I
> understand the logic why you went that way.
> 
> I wonder if "virDomainResAllocDef" is any better (resallocs, nresallocs)?  or if
> that clashes with any other namespace so far?  or is too close to
> virResctrlAllocPtr.
> 
> Or perhaps "virDomainResCtrlDef" w/ resctrls and nresctrls to mimic the
> virresctrl.{c,h} naming scheme.
> 
Hi John, 
I have made a comment without reading above line... 
Yes! This is what I want to change for the naming. 'virDomainResCtrlDef' looks
Ok for me.

> As previously stated, "Naming is hard"... Wish there was more feedback than
> just me on this, but in the long run, I'll go with whatever the Intel team agrees
> upon as it's not that big a deal. If someone else has agita after things are pushed
> and wants to change the name, then they know how to send patches.
> 
> John
> 
> [...]




More information about the libvir-list mailing list