[libvirt] [PATCH v2] xenconfig: xm: Fix checking for extra in parser
Cole Robinson
crobinso at redhat.com
Tue May 15 13:37:34 UTC 2018
On 05/12/2018 11:45 AM, Filip Alac wrote:
> Parser assumed extra was always present when root was specified.
> Fixed by handling root and extra separately.
>
> Signed-off-by: Filip Alac <filipalac at gmail.com>
> ---
> src/xenconfig/xen_xm.c | 7 +++++--
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/src/xenconfig/xen_xm.c b/src/xenconfig/xen_xm.c
> index 8ef68bbc..4becb40b 100644
> --- a/src/xenconfig/xen_xm.c
> +++ b/src/xenconfig/xen_xm.c
> @@ -91,10 +91,13 @@ xenParseXMOS(virConfPtr conf, virDomainDefPtr def)
> if (xenConfigGetString(conf, "root", &root, NULL) < 0)
> return -1;
>
> - if (root) {
> + if (root && extra) {
> if (virAsprintf(&def->os.cmdline, "root=%s %s", root, extra) < 0)
> return -1;
> - } else {
> + } else if (root) {
> + if (virAsprintf(&def->os.cmdline, "root=%s", root) < 0)
> + return -1;
> + } else if (extra) {
> if (VIR_STRDUP(def->os.cmdline, extra) < 0)
> return -1;
> }
>
I'm guessing you came to this issue via
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1327578 . In the future
please add a link to the bug report in the git commit message
Also this is a good candidate for extending the test suite,
tests/xmconfigdata and tests/xmconfigtest.c
Thanks,
Cole
More information about the libvir-list
mailing list