[libvirt] [PATCH v2] xenconfig: xm: Fix checking for extra in parser

Cole Robinson crobinso at redhat.com
Tue May 15 13:37:34 UTC 2018


On 05/12/2018 11:45 AM, Filip Alac wrote:
> Parser assumed extra was always present when root was specified.
> Fixed by handling root and extra separately.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Filip Alac <filipalac at gmail.com>
> ---
>  src/xenconfig/xen_xm.c | 7 +++++--
>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/src/xenconfig/xen_xm.c b/src/xenconfig/xen_xm.c
> index 8ef68bbc..4becb40b 100644
> --- a/src/xenconfig/xen_xm.c
> +++ b/src/xenconfig/xen_xm.c
> @@ -91,10 +91,13 @@ xenParseXMOS(virConfPtr conf, virDomainDefPtr def)
>          if (xenConfigGetString(conf, "root", &root, NULL) < 0)
>              return -1;
>  
> -        if (root) {
> +        if (root && extra) {
>              if (virAsprintf(&def->os.cmdline, "root=%s %s", root, extra) < 0)
>                  return -1;
> -        } else {
> +        } else if (root) {
> +            if (virAsprintf(&def->os.cmdline, "root=%s", root) < 0)
> +                return -1;
> +        } else if (extra) {
>              if (VIR_STRDUP(def->os.cmdline, extra) < 0)
>                  return -1;
>          }
> 

I'm guessing you came to this issue via
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1327578 . In the future
please add a link to the bug report in the git commit message

Also this is a good candidate for extending the test suite,
tests/xmconfigdata and tests/xmconfigtest.c

Thanks,
Cole




More information about the libvir-list mailing list