[libvirt] [PATCH v4 2/5] libxl: add support for PVH

Jim Fehlig jfehlig at suse.com
Fri Oct 19 16:48:35 UTC 2018


On 10/19/18 9:25 AM, Marek Marczykowski-Górecki wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 19, 2018 at 04:19:21PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
>> On Fri, Oct 19, 2018 at 05:10:30PM +0200, Marek Marczykowski-Górecki wrote:
>>> On Fri, Oct 19, 2018 at 03:59:03PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
>>>> On Fri, Oct 19, 2018 at 08:53:15AM -0600, Jim Fehlig wrote:
>>>>> own head) for either of the two modeling approaches
>>>>>
>>>>> https://www.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/2018-October/msg00214.html
>>>>> https://www.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/2018-October/msg00891.html
>>>>
>>>> It has a bad name, but essentially you should consider "ostype" to
>>>> refer to the   Hypervisor <-> Guest hardware ABI.
>>>
>>> Oh, if that's the case, then indeed separate ostype makes sense. Maybe
>>> it worth expanding ostype description somewhere in documentation?
> 
> Also, such definition of os type, make "linux" os type for Xen PV even weirder...

Yeah, I wish we could ditch it.

BTW, please include a patch for docs/news.xml in V5. Thanks!

Regards,
Jim




More information about the libvir-list mailing list