[libvirt] [PATCH v2 1/3] qemu: add vfio-ap capability

Chris Venteicher cventeic at redhat.com
Thu Oct 25 03:17:25 UTC 2018


Quoting Thomas Huth (2018-10-19 06:58:34)
> On 2018-10-18 16:54, Boris Fiuczynski wrote:
> > Introduce vfio-ap capability.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Boris Fiuczynski <fiuczy at linux.ibm.com>
> > Reviewed-by: Bjoern Walk <bwalk at linux.ibm.com>
> > ---
> >  src/qemu/qemu_capabilities.c | 2 ++
> >  src/qemu/qemu_capabilities.h | 1 +
> >  2 files changed, 3 insertions(+)
> > 
> > diff --git a/src/qemu/qemu_capabilities.c b/src/qemu/qemu_capabilities.c
> > index e228f52ec0..2ca5af3297 100644
> > --- a/src/qemu/qemu_capabilities.c
> > +++ b/src/qemu/qemu_capabilities.c
> > @@ -508,6 +508,7 @@ VIR_ENUM_IMPL(virQEMUCaps, QEMU_CAPS_LAST,
> >                /* 315 */
> >                "vfio-pci.display",
> >                "blockdev",
> > +              "vfio-ap",
> >      );
> >  

The statement "On s390, we have cryptographic coprocessor cards,
which are modeled on Linux as devices on the AP bus."
was made in email titled "s390: vfio-ap: guest dedicated crypto adapters"

Does this imply other devices can exist on an AP Bus?

Any chance this should be something like "vfio-ap.crypto" in the same
way a "vfio-pci.display" entry is listed above seemingly implying a
display device on a more generic pci bus? Or does "vfio-ap" always imply
crypto?

Having difficulty sorting out the relationships between adjunct
processor, crypto processor and ap bus from the patch docs and initial
review of the references.

> >
> > @@ -1092,6 +1093,7 @@ struct virQEMUCapsStringFlags virQEMUCapsObjectTypes[] = {
> >      { "vhost-vsock-device", QEMU_CAPS_DEVICE_VHOST_VSOCK },
> >      { "mch", QEMU_CAPS_DEVICE_MCH },
> >      { "sev-guest", QEMU_CAPS_SEV_GUEST },
> > +    { "vfio-ap", QEMU_CAPS_DEVICE_VFIO_AP },
> >  };
> >  
> >  static struct virQEMUCapsStringFlags virQEMUCapsDevicePropsVirtioBalloon[] = {
> > diff --git a/src/qemu/qemu_capabilities.h b/src/qemu/qemu_capabilities.h
> > index 934620ed31..6bb9a2c8f0 100644
> > --- a/src/qemu/qemu_capabilities.h
> > +++ b/src/qemu/qemu_capabilities.h
> > @@ -492,6 +492,7 @@ typedef enum { /* virQEMUCapsFlags grouping marker for syntax-check */
> >      /* 315 */
> >      QEMU_CAPS_VFIO_PCI_DISPLAY, /* -device vfio-pci.display */
> >      QEMU_CAPS_BLOCKDEV, /* -blockdev and blockdev-add are supported */
> > +    QEMU_CAPS_DEVICE_VFIO_AP, /* -device vfio-ap */
> >  
> >      QEMU_CAPS_LAST /* this must always be the last item */
> >  } virQEMUCapsFlags;
> > 
> 
> Reviewed-by: Thomas Huth <thuth at redhat.com>
> 
> --
> libvir-list mailing list
> libvir-list at redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list




More information about the libvir-list mailing list