[libvirt] [PATCH v4 04/23] virSecurityManagerTransactionCommit: Accept pid == -1

John Ferlan jferlan at redhat.com
Fri Sep 14 21:11:41 UTC 2018



On 09/10/2018 05:36 AM, Michal Privoznik wrote:
> It will be desirable to run transactions more often than we
> currently do. Even if the domain we're relabeling the paths for
> does not run in a namespace. If that's the case, there is no need
> to fork() as we are already running in the right namespace. To
> differentiate whether transaction code should fork() or not the
> @pid argument now accepts -1 (which means do not fork).
> 
> Signed-off-by: Michal Privoznik <mprivozn at redhat.com>
> ---
>  src/security/security_dac.c     | 22 ++++++++++++++--------
>  src/security/security_manager.c | 14 +++++++++-----
>  src/security/security_selinux.c | 23 +++++++++++++++--------
>  3 files changed, 38 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
> 

I do have a dislike for the code format chosen - I prefer:

if (pid == -1)
else

is so much easier for me to read.

Reviewed-by: John Ferlan <jferlan at redhat.com>

John




More information about the libvir-list mailing list