[libvirt] [libvirt PATCH v7 4/6] xen_common: Change xenParsePCIList to using virConfGetValueStringList

[Fabiano Fidêncio]

On Thu, Sep 20, 2018 at 10:18 PM, John Ferlan <jferlan at redhat.com> wrote:

>
>
> On 09/20/2018 09:28 AM, Fabiano Fidêncio wrote:
> > The `if(!list || list->type != VIR_CONF_LIST)` check couldn't be
> > written in a 100% similar way. Instead, we're just checking whether
> > `virConfGetValueStringList() <= 0` and creating a new function to:
> > - return -1 in case virConfGetValueStringList fails either due to some
> >   allocation failure or when traversing the list;
> > - resetting the last error and return 0 otherwise;
> >
> > Taking this approach we can have the behaviour with the new code as
> > close as possible to the old one.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Fabiano Fidêncio <fidencio at redhat.com>
> > ---
> >  src/xenconfig/xen_common.c | 34 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
> >  1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/src/xenconfig/xen_common.c b/src/xenconfig/xen_common.c
> > index 7b3e5c3b44..9133998cd7 100644
> > --- a/src/xenconfig/xen_common.c
> > +++ b/src/xenconfig/xen_common.c
> > @@ -458,22 +458,40 @@ xenParsePCI(char *entry)
> >      return hostdev;
> >  }
> >
>
> Things you will get used to eventually... New functions with 2 blank
> lines and each argument on one line, although I don't believe you need
> to pass errorCode here.
>

Okay, noted!


>
> > +static int
> > +xenHandleConfGetValueStringListErrors(int ret, int errorCode)
> > +{
> > +    if (ret < 0) {
> > +        /* It means virConfGetValueStringList() didn't fail because the
> > +         * cval->type switch fell through - since we're passing
> > +         * @compatString == false - assumes failures for memory
> allocation
> > +         * and VIR_CONF_LIST traversal failure should cause -1 to be
> > +         * returned to the caller with the error message set. */
> > +        if (errorCode != VIR_ERR_INTERNAL_ERROR)
> > +            return -1;
> > +
> > +        /* If we did fall through the switch, then ignore and clear the
> > +         * last error. */
> > +        virResetLastError();
> > +    }
> > +    return 0;
> > +}
> >
> >  static int
> >  xenParsePCIList(virConfPtr conf, virDomainDefPtr def)
> >  {
> > -    virConfValuePtr list = virConfGetValue(conf, "pci");
> > +    VIR_AUTOPTR(virString) pcis = NULL;
> > +    virString *entries = NULL;
> > +    int rc;
> >
> > -    if (!list || list->type != VIR_CONF_LIST)
> > -        return 0;
> > +    if ((rc = virConfGetValueStringList(conf, "pci", false, &pcis)) <=
> 0)
> > +        return xenHandleConfGetValueStringListErrors(rc,
> virGetLastErrorCode());
>
> No need to pass virGetLastErrorCode - in the 3 uses I see it's not
> changing and the called method can make that call.
>
> I can alter before pushing if you're fine with that.
>

Yes, I'm fine with that. Please, do the changes before pushing! :-)


>
> Reviewed-by: John Ferlan <jferlan at redhat.com>
>
> John
>
>
> [...]
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/attachments/20180920/89054a44/attachment-0001.htm>