[libvirt] [PATCH] ci: Adapt to container name changes

[Fabiano Fidêncio]

On Fri, 2019-08-16 at 15:51 +0200, Andrea Bolognani wrote:
> On Fri, 2019-08-16 at 14:32 +0200, Fabiano Fidêncio wrote:
> > On Mon, 2019-08-12 at 16:09 +0200, Andrea Bolognani wrote:
> > > This is connected to
> > > 
> > > https://www.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/2019-August/msg00399.html
> > > 
> > > https://www.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/2019-August/msg00416.html
> > > 
> > > and should only be merged once the above have been merged *and*
> > > deployed, as in, images with the new names have been generated.
> > 
> > Reviewed-by: Fabiano Fidêncio <fidencio at redhat.com>
> 
> Thanks for the reviews!
> 
> I have pushed the other two series but I can't quite push this one
> yet because, as we already know, a bunch of MinGW packages have been
> dropped from Fedora and thus the buildenv-libvirt-fedora-rawhide
> container can't currently be built successfully:
> 
>   No match for argument: mingw32-portablexdr
>   No match for argument: mingw64-portablexdr
>   Error: Unable to find a match: mingw32-portablexdr mingw64-
> portablexdr
> 
> I think the situation would be the same for the libosinfo container.
> 
> Do you have any idea how long it will take to get the packages back
> in Fedora?

We're working on it.
For mingw-portablexdr we may end up not adding it back and adding
mingw-libtirpc.

For mingw-libsoup (which is the piece missing from libosinfo side),
we've already asked to un-retire the package.

Bugs are still open though.

> Should we just wait for that to happen before rebuilding
> the containers, temporarily disable MinGW builds, temporarily switch
> MinGW builds to Fedora 30 where I assume all MinGW packages are still
> available?

I'd go for this solution, stick to Fedora 30, at least till the
situation is back to stable on rawhide.

I'll provide you some patches for this and regenerate the images.

Best Regards,
-- 
Fabiano Fidêncio