[libvirt] [PATCH v1 07/11] virStoragePoolObjListAdd: Separate out definition assignment
Michal Privoznik
mprivozn at redhat.com
Tue Aug 20 14:33:48 UTC 2019
On 8/19/19 6:08 PM, John Ferlan wrote:
> Was it intentional to swap the order?
>
That's a good question. Honestly, I don't recall. I'll fix it in my
local branch. It looks like we should set the new pool definition with
the pool list locked so that virStoragePoolObjIsDuplicate() and
virStoragePoolObjSourceFindDuplicate() can return expected value if two
threads were fighting.
Michal
More information about the libvir-list
mailing list