[libvirt] [tck PATCH 1/4] storage: skip qcow1 tests when qcow1 isn't supported by qemu-img

Laine Stump laine at laine.org
Mon Feb 11 14:46:47 UTC 2019


On 2/11/19 6:12 AM, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 11, 2019 at 06:10:38AM -0500, Laine Stump wrote:
>> On Mon, Feb 11, 2019, 5:47 AM Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange at redhat.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> On Thu, Feb 07, 2019 at 10:08:28PM -0500, Laine Stump wrote:
>>>> RHEL8 has dropped support for qcow1 format images, so skip the tests
>>>> related to creating/cloning qcow1 images (based on the output of
>>>> qemu-img -help).
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Laine Stump <laine at laine.org>
>>>> ---
>>>>   scripts/storage/100-create-vol-dir.t | 22 ++++++++-----
>>>>   scripts/storage/200-clone-vol-dir.t  | 48 ++++++++++++++++------------
>>>>   2 files changed, 41 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-)
>>> Reviewed-by: Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange at redhat.com>
>>>
>>>
>>> This is an example where libvirt storage pool capabilities would be
>>> useful.
>>>
>> Yeah, or maybe listing the supported types in the device capabilities for
>> the disks. I had meant to point that out but forgot.
> We would need both, because QEMU has a setup where qemu-img can support a
> disk format while qemu-system-XXX will not support it. This is so that
> we can limit what is usable at runtime, but still have qemu-img for data
> liberation from old format images.


Now that you mention that, I'm surprised that's not the case with RHEL8 
and qcow1 - qemu-img doesn't support it. Maybe they got a bit 
over-zealous when deprecating/removing qcow1 support.





More information about the libvir-list mailing list