[libvirt] [PATCH] virfile: added GPFS as shared fs

Daniel P. Berrangé berrange at redhat.com
Tue Feb 26 09:48:06 UTC 2019


On Tue, Feb 26, 2019 at 09:08:27AM +0100, Peter Krempa wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 25, 2019 at 19:19:03 +0100, Diego Michelotto wrote:
> > From: dmichelotto <diego.michelotto at cnaf.infn.it>
> 
> With your permission I'll remove the above line when applying the patch
> so that your authorship of the patch shows up as:
> 
> Author: Diego Michelotto <diego.michelotto at cnaf.infn.it>
> 
> instead of
> 
> Author: dmichelotto <diego.michelotto at cnaf.infn.it>
> 
> > 
> > Added GPFS as shared file system recognized during live migration
> > security checks.
> > 
> > GPFS is 'IBM General Parallel File System' also called
> > 'IBM Spectrum Scale'
> > 
> > BUG: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1679528
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Diego Michelotto <diego.michelotto at cnaf.infn.it>
> > ---
> >  src/util/virfile.c            | 9 ++++++++-
> >  src/util/virfile.h            | 1 +
> >  tests/virfiledata/mounts3.txt | 1 +
> >  tests/virfilemock.c           | 5 +++++
> >  tests/virfiletest.c           | 1 +
> >  5 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> One thing which might be worth exploring is whether GPFS is also
> migratable with cache != none and thus should be also added to
> virStorageFileIsClusterFS.
> 
> ACK.
> 
> Depending on the angle of view this can be viewed both as a bug and as a
> feature. Since we are feature freeze, is anybody objecting in pushing
> this right away? (obviously I'm not going to push it right now)

I can see it both ways, but regardless I think this is safe enough to
push during freeze.


Regards,
Daniel
-- 
|: https://berrange.com      -o-    https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :|
|: https://libvirt.org         -o-            https://fstop138.berrange.com :|
|: https://entangle-photo.org    -o-    https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :|




More information about the libvir-list mailing list