[libvirt] [PATCH] virfile: added GPFS as shared fs
Daniel P. Berrangé
berrange at redhat.com
Tue Feb 26 09:48:06 UTC 2019
On Tue, Feb 26, 2019 at 09:08:27AM +0100, Peter Krempa wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 25, 2019 at 19:19:03 +0100, Diego Michelotto wrote:
> > From: dmichelotto <diego.michelotto at cnaf.infn.it>
>
> With your permission I'll remove the above line when applying the patch
> so that your authorship of the patch shows up as:
>
> Author: Diego Michelotto <diego.michelotto at cnaf.infn.it>
>
> instead of
>
> Author: dmichelotto <diego.michelotto at cnaf.infn.it>
>
> >
> > Added GPFS as shared file system recognized during live migration
> > security checks.
> >
> > GPFS is 'IBM General Parallel File System' also called
> > 'IBM Spectrum Scale'
> >
> > BUG: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1679528
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Diego Michelotto <diego.michelotto at cnaf.infn.it>
> > ---
> > src/util/virfile.c | 9 ++++++++-
> > src/util/virfile.h | 1 +
> > tests/virfiledata/mounts3.txt | 1 +
> > tests/virfilemock.c | 5 +++++
> > tests/virfiletest.c | 1 +
> > 5 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> One thing which might be worth exploring is whether GPFS is also
> migratable with cache != none and thus should be also added to
> virStorageFileIsClusterFS.
>
> ACK.
>
> Depending on the angle of view this can be viewed both as a bug and as a
> feature. Since we are feature freeze, is anybody objecting in pushing
> this right away? (obviously I'm not going to push it right now)
I can see it both ways, but regardless I think this is safe enough to
push during freeze.
Regards,
Daniel
--
|: https://berrange.com -o- https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :|
|: https://libvirt.org -o- https://fstop138.berrange.com :|
|: https://entangle-photo.org -o- https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :|
More information about the libvir-list
mailing list