[libvirt] [PATCH 05/27] network: add missing bandwidth limits for bridge forward type

Daniel P. Berrangé berrange at redhat.com
Tue Jan 29 15:06:34 UTC 2019


On Tue, Jan 08, 2019 at 05:16:25PM +0100, Michal Privoznik wrote:
> On 12/24/18 3:58 PM, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> > In the case of a network with forward=bridge, which has a bridge device
> > listed, we are capable of setting bandwidth limits but fail to call the
> > function to register them.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange at redhat.com>
> > ---
> >  src/network/bridge_driver.c | 17 +++++++++++++++--
> >  1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/src/network/bridge_driver.c b/src/network/bridge_driver.c
> > index b5aac9350b..2639b5ce61 100644
> > --- a/src/network/bridge_driver.c
> > +++ b/src/network/bridge_driver.c
> > @@ -3374,7 +3374,13 @@ networkValidate(virNetworkDriverStatePtr driver,
> >                             virNetworkForwardTypeToString(def->forward.type));
> >              return -1;
> >          }
> > -        if (def->bandwidth) {
> > +
> > +        bandwidthAllowed = (
> > +            def->forward.type == VIR_NETWORK_FORWARD_BRIDGE &&
> > +            def->bridge != NULL);
> 
> Whoa. This looks ugly. Can you please turn it into:
>   bool bandwidthAllowed = false;
> 
>   if (...)
>     bandwidthAllowed = true;

Ok, i'll refactor this a little

> 
> > +
> > +        if (def->bandwidth &&
> > +            !bandwidthAllowed) {
> >              virReportError(VIR_ERR_CONFIG_UNSUPPORTED,
> >                             _("Unsupported network-wide <bandwidth> element "
> >                               "in network %s with forward mode='%s'"),

Regards,
Daniel
-- 
|: https://berrange.com      -o-    https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :|
|: https://libvirt.org         -o-            https://fstop138.berrange.com :|
|: https://entangle-photo.org    -o-    https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :|




More information about the libvir-list mailing list