[libvirt] [go PATCH] Add support for virNetworkPort object and APIs
Daniel P. Berrangé
berrange at redhat.com
Tue Jun 18 17:01:17 UTC 2019
On Tue, Jun 18, 2019 at 06:33:01PM +0200, Christophe de Dinechin wrote:
>
>
> > On 18 Jun 2019, at 17:43, Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange at redhat.com> wrote:
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange at redhat.com>
> > ---
> > network.go | 80 ++++++++++++++
> > network_port.go | 233 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > network_port_compat.h | 67 ++++++++++++
> > network_port_wrapper.go | 197 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > network_port_wrapper.h | 79 ++++++++++++++
> > network_wrapper.go | 73 +++++++++++++
> > network_wrapper.h | 23 ++++
> > 7 files changed, 752 insertions(+)
> > create mode 100644 network_port.go
> > create mode 100644 network_port_compat.h
> > create mode 100644 network_port_wrapper.go
> > create mode 100644 network_port_wrapper.h
> > +package libvirt
> > +
> > +/*
> > +#cgo pkg-config: libvirt
> > +#include <assert.h>
> > +#include "network_port_wrapper.h"
> > +
> > +virNetworkPtr
> > +virNetworkPortGetNetworkWrapper(virNetworkPortPtr port,
> > + virErrorPtr err)
> > +{
> > +#if LIBVIR_VERSION_NUMBER < 5005000
> > + assert(0); // Caller should have checked version
>
> What about
>
> assert(!”C function not available in this version - Caller should have checked version”);
>
> ?
That's certainly possible, but I'm not sure its worth bothering with
since this should never be hit in practice & if it is hit we'll see
the offending code in the crash dump easily enough.
Regards,
Daniel
--
|: https://berrange.com -o- https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :|
|: https://libvirt.org -o- https://fstop138.berrange.com :|
|: https://entangle-photo.org -o- https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :|
More information about the libvir-list
mailing list