[libvirt] [jenkins-ci] guests: Add support for openSUSE Leap 15.1

Fabiano Fidêncio fidencio at redhat.com
Wed Nov 20 06:56:24 UTC 2019


On Wed, Nov 20, 2019 at 12:01 AM Jim Fehlig <jfehlig at suse.com> wrote:
>
> On 11/19/19 3:32 AM, Andrea Bolognani wrote:
> > On Tue, 2019-11-19 at 00:21 +0000, Jim Fehlig wrote:
> >> Signed-off-by: Jim Fehlig <jfehlig at suse.com>
> >> ---
> >>   guests/configs/autoinst.xml                   | 86 +++++++++++++++++++
> >>   .../libvirt-opensuse-15.1/docker.yml          |  2 +
> >>   .../libvirt-opensuse-15.1/install.yml         |  2 +
> >>   .../host_vars/libvirt-opensuse-15.1/main.yml  | 22 +++++
> >>   guests/inventory                              |  1 +
> >>   guests/lcitool                                |  2 +
> >>   guests/vars/mappings.yml                      | 38 +++++++-
> >>   7 files changed, 151 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > First of all, thank you for following through with your promise of
> > looking into this! I'm looking forward to being able to merge your
> > changes and finally have proper openSUSE support in our CI :)
>
> Thanks for the help!
>
> > [...]
> >> +++ b/guests/configs/autoinst.xml
> >> +  <partitioning config:type="list">
> >> +    <drive>
> >> +      <device>/dev/vda</device>
> >> +      <use>all</use>
> >> +      <partitions config:type="list">
> >> +        <partition>
> >> +          <filesystem config:type="symbol">swap</filesystem>
> >> +          <size>500M</size>
> >> +          <mount>swap</mount>
> >
> > We give other guests only 256 MiB of swap, so do the same here to
> > be consistent. Building libvirt and friends is CPU-bound rather than
> > memory-bound anyway, so more than that leeway is not necessary.
> >
> > [...]
> >> +  <add-on>
> >> +    <add_on_products config:type="list">
> >> +      <listentry>
> >> +        <media_url>http://download.opensuse.org/distribution/leap/15.1/repo/oss/</media_url>
> >> +        <name>repo-oss</name>
> >> +      </listentry>
> >> +      <listentry>
> >> +        <media_url>http://download.opensuse.org/update/leap/15.1/oss</media_url>
> >> +        <name>repo-update</name>
> >> +      </listentry>
> >> +      <listentry>
> >> +        <media_url>http://download.opensuse.org/distribution/leap/15.1/repo/non-oss/</media_url>
> >> +        <name>repo-non-oss</name>
> >> +      </listentry>
> >> +      <listentry>
> >> +        <media_url>http://download.opensuse.org/update/leap/15.1/non-oss/</media_url>
> >> +        <name>repo-update-non-oss</name>
> >> +      </listentry>
> >
> > Do we actually need the non-OSS repositories to be updated? I would
> > hope not! But I'm not familiar with how openSUSE organizes its
> > repositories, so I'm going by name only :)
>
> Probably not needed. I'll try to trim this after working through other issues.
>
> > [...]
> >> +  <firewall>
> >> +    <enable_firewall>true</enable_firewall>
> >> +  </firewall>
> >
> > As you mention somewhere else, we probably don't need this.
> >
> > [...]
> >> +++ b/guests/host_vars/libvirt-opensuse-15.1/main.yml
> >> +package_format: 'rpm'
> >> +package_manager: 'zypper'
> >> +os_name: 'openSUSE'
> >> +os_version: '15.1'
> >
> > So, about the naming.
> >
> > What I would have done here is
> >
> >    os_name: 'OpenSUSE'
> >    os_version: '15'
> >
> > The intial capital letter in os_name goes against the actual branding
> > for openSUSE so I'm not perfectly happy with it, but on the other
> > hand it's very useful when defining mappings because package formats
> > all start with a lowercase letter and all OS names start with an
> > uppercase letter. So I would try to stick with that convention.
>
> Ok, no problem.
>
> > As for os_version, if you look at all existing entries we use the
> > major version number only: eg. we have CentOS7 instead of CentOS7.7
> > and FreeBSD12 instead of FreeBSD12.1: this makes sense because, as
> > the guest gets updated over time, it will naturally pick up the
> > latest minor release. Will this work for openSUSE too?
>
> I suppose so. Although for example Leap 15.2 will have a different kernel (5.3.
> vs 4.12), different install path
> (http://download.opensuse.org/distribution/leap/15.2/repo/oss/), etc. Is that okay?

It depends a lot on what's the OpenSUSE policy of its distro. Once
15.2 is out, what happens to 15.1? Is this just a "minor" update? Will
15.1 still be supported or are people expected to just update /
upgrade to 15.2?

>
> > (Ubuntu is a slight exception in that the major version itself
> > contains a dot, so we just shortened 18.04 to 18 because we know
> > that there's never going to be two LTS releases per year.)
> >
> >> +++ b/guests/host_vars/libvirt-opensuse-15.1/docker.yml
> >> @@ -0,0 +1,2 @@
> >> +---
> >> +docker_base: openSUSE:15.1
> >
> > I believe these images are now deprecated, and opensuse/leap
> > should be used instead.
> >
> > Looking at
> >
> >    https://hub.docker.com/r/opensuse/leap/tags
> >
> > I see that the '15.1', '15' and 'latest' tags point to the same set
> > of digests, so that seems to confirm that we can use just 15 as the
> > version number and have
> >
> >    docker_base: opensuse/leap:15
> >
> > in this file.
>
> Sorry, I didn't even look at this. I simply put something in there with a mental
> note to check on it later. Thanks for checking on it sooner :-).
>
> >
> > [...]
> >> +++ b/guests/inventory
> >> @@ -8,5 +8,6 @@ libvirt-fedora-rawhide
> >>   libvirt-freebsd-11
> >>   libvirt-freebsd-12
> >>   libvirt-freebsd-current
> >> +libvirt-opensuse-15.1
> >
> > Based on the points above, I think this could and should be
> >
> >    libvirt-opensuse-15
> >
> > [...]
> >> @@ -127,6 +129,7 @@ mappings:
> >>     dbus-daemon:
> >>       default: dbus
> >>       Fedora: dbus-daemon
> >> +    openSUSE: dbus-1
> >
> > You see how weird this looks, due to the first letter being
> > lower case? :)
> >
> > I'm not going to review the mappings in detail right now because I
> > simply lack the time. Once 'lcitool update' works for you without
> > errors, I'll look into it.
>
> Sounds good.
>
> > Fabiano already pointed out where you need to look to sort out the
> > issues you've been experiencing, so I'll leave you to it now :)
>
> Thanks to you both!
>
> Regards,
> Jim
>
> --
> libvir-list mailing list
> libvir-list at redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list
>





More information about the libvir-list mailing list