[libvirt] [PATCH v2 08/20] po: detect zanata binary during configure time

Pavel Hrdina phrdina at redhat.com
Thu Oct 24 12:46:53 UTC 2019


On Thu, Oct 24, 2019 at 01:19:51PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 24, 2019 at 01:50:50PM +0200, Pavel Hrdina wrote:
> > Currently we had hard-coded `zanata` as a name of the binary, but
> > it can also be `zanata-cli`.
> 
> FWIW, I hardcoded 'zanata' for two reasons
> 
>  - It is a light weight python client, compared to the java
>    client which pulls in a huge dep chains.
>  - I found the java client unreliable eg several times when
>    pushing a new .pot file, it pushed the pot but failed to tell
>    the server to preserve existing translations, so we lost all
>    translations.
> 
> I'd hope the latter is fixed now, but honestly I would still
> not recommend using the java client, when the python client
> is working nicely.
> 
> Is there a particular reason you wanted to make it autodetect ?

I was not aware of the python client, I just thought that it was an
older/different version of the java client.

It looks like that the python client supports specifying srcdir and
transdir and project-config so it can be used with the same/similar
options.

We can drop this patch, update po/README.md file to state that we
require the python client and update the previous patch to use correct
options.

The difference between zanata-cli and zanata for our use-case is:

                                |    zanata-cli     |   zanata
    --------------------------- |-------------------|-----------------
    where libvirt.pot is        |   --src-dir       |   --srcdir
    where $LANG.po files are    |   --trans-dir     |   --transdir


Pavel
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/attachments/20191024/9096bd8f/attachment-0001.sig>


More information about the libvir-list mailing list