[libvirt] [PATCH] libvirt.spec.in: Add the Secure Boot-variant OVMF binaries

Cole Robinson crobinso at redhat.com
Tue Sep 10 18:56:44 UTC 2019


On 7/30/19 12:11 PM, Kashyap Chamarthy wrote:
> Currently the RPM spec doesn't add the 'secboot'-variant OVMF binaries
> (an unintentional omission, checking with Cole on #virt, OFTC) for
> 'x86_64' and 'ia32'.  Add them.
> 
> This way, getDomainCapabilities() will report all the OVMF binaries that
> are present on the system.  E.g. on Fedora 29, if you only have the
> edk2-ovmf-20190308stable-1.fc29.noarch package installed, then running
> `virsh domcapabilities` will enumerate _both_ the OVMF binaries (instead
> of just the OVMF_CODE.fd):
> 
>   $> virsh getdomcapabilities
>     ...
>     <loader supported='yes'>
>       <value>/usr/share/edk2/ovmf/OVMF_CODE.fd</value>
>       <value>/usr/share/edk2/ovmf/OVMF_CODE.secboot.fd</value>
>     ...
> 
> (
> Learnt this from a discussion with Michal Privoznik in this bug,
> comment#2:
> 
>     https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1733940 -- RFE: Report
>     firmware (FW) paths in domainCapabilities based on FW descriptor
>     files
> )
> 
> Signed-off-by: Kashyap Chamarthy <kchamart at redhat.com>
> ---
> I only did a cursory check on if I missed to add any other valid paths
> for other architectures.
> ---

For the change:

Reviewed-by: Cole Robinson <crobinso at redhat.com>

But I'm not sure how much we care now that firmware.repo is in the mix.
I'll leave it up to Michal whether to apply

- Cole



>  libvirt.spec.in | 9 ++++++++-
>  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/libvirt.spec.in b/libvirt.spec.in
> index b13b863928..99950495a7 100644
> --- a/libvirt.spec.in
> +++ b/libvirt.spec.in
> @@ -1135,10 +1135,17 @@ exit 1
>      # Nightly edk2.git-arm
>      LOADERS="$LOADERS:/usr/share/edk2.git/arm/QEMU_EFI-pflash.raw:/usr/share/edk2.git/arm/vars-template-pflash.raw"
>  
> -    # Fedora edk2-ovmf
> +    # Fedora edk2-ovmf, x86_64
>      LOADERS="$LOADERS:/usr/share/edk2/ovmf/OVMF_CODE.fd:/usr/share/edk2/ovmf/OVMF_VARS.fd"
> +    # Fedora edk2-ovmf, x86_64, with Secure Boot
> +    LOADERS="$LOADERS:/usr/share/edk2/ovmf/OVMF_CODE.secboot.fd:/usr/share/edk2/ovmf/OVMF_VARS.secboot.fd"
>      # Fedora edk2-ovmf-ia32
>      LOADERS="$LOADERS:/usr/share/edk2/ovmf-ia32/OVMF_CODE.fd:/usr/share/edk2/ovmf-ia32/OVMF_VARS.fd"
> +    # Fedora edk2-ovmf-ia32, with Secure Boot.  (NB: Unlike x86_64, for
> +    # 'ia32', there is no secboot-variant "VARS" file (NVRAM template).
> +    # So the NVRAM template for 'ovmf-ia32/OVMF_CODE.secboot.fd' is the
> +    # same as the one for the non-secboot variant.)
> +    LOADERS="$LOADERS:/usr/share/edk2/ovmf-ia32/OVMF_CODE.secboot.fd:/usr/share/edk2/ovmf-ia32/OVMF_VARS.fd"
>      # Fedora edk2-aarch64
>      LOADERS="$LOADERS:/usr/share/edk2/aarch64/QEMU_EFI-pflash.raw:/usr/share/edk2/aarch64/vars-template-pflash.raw"
>      # Fedora edk2-arm
> 


- Cole




More information about the libvir-list mailing list