[libvirt PATCH 4/4] docs: Remove one example from pci-addresses.rst

Andrea Bolognani abologna at redhat.com
Thu Apr 16 12:23:14 UTC 2020

On Thu, 2020-04-16 at 12:29 +0200, Boris Fiuczynski wrote:
> I suggest to use the zpci addressing from the removed example because it 
> outlines more clearly the differences in the parameters.
> Something like the example below:
> For s390x machines, PCI addresses are handled yet differently. No 
> topology information is relayed in the PCI addresses; instead, the fid 
> and uid elements of the zpci device convey information. In the simplest 
> case, the following XML snippet
> <controller type='pci' index='0' model='pci-root'/>
> <controller type='pci' index='1' model='pci-bridge'>
>    <model name='pci-bridge'/>
>    <target chassisNr='1'/>
>    <address type='pci' domain='0x0000' bus='0x00' slot='0x01' 
> function='0x0'>
>      <zpci uid='0x0001' fid='0x00000000'/>
>    </address>
> </controller>
> <interface type='bridge'>
>    <mac address='02:ca:fe:fa:ce:04'/>
>    <source bridge='virbr0'/>
>    <model type='virtio'/>
>    <address type='pci' domain='0x0000' bus='0x01' slot='0x01' 
> function='0x0'>
>      <zpci uid='0x0007' fid='0x00000003'/>
>    </address>
> </interface>
> will result in the following in a Linux guest:
> 0007:00:00.0 Ethernet controller: Red Hat, Inc. Virtio network device

You're right, this example is more illustrative. Care to submit a
patch changing it?

Andrea Bolognani / Red Hat / Virtualization

More information about the libvir-list mailing list