[RFC PATCH 3/6] docs: added rng schema and formatdomain for NFS

[Laine Stump]

On 12/14/20 5:57 PM, Ryan Gahagan wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 10, 2020 at 10:37 PM Han Han <hhan at redhat.com 
> <mailto:hhan at redhat.com>> wrote:
>
>     On Fri, Dec 11, 2020 at 4:00 AM Ryan Gahagan
>     <rgahagan at cs.utexas.edu <mailto:rgahagan at cs.utexas.edu>> wrote:
>
>         diff --git a/docs/formatdomain.rst b/docs/formatdomain.rst
>         index 512939679b..40a1a3c1e2 100644
>         --- a/docs/formatdomain.rst
>         +++ b/docs/formatdomain.rst
>         @@ -2601,6 +2601,7 @@ paravirtualized driver is specified via
>         the ``disk`` element.
>                sheepdog one of the sheepdog servers (default is
>         localhost:7000) zero or one                           7000
>                gluster  a server running glusterd daemon              
>             one or more ( :since:`Since 2.1.0` ), just one prior to
>         that 24007
>                vxhs     a server running Veritas HyperScale daemon   
>                   only one                            9999
>         +      nfs      a server running Network File System          
>                 only one                          2049
>
>     Mention the feature introduced version here.
>
> What version would we specify? QEMU's version 2.9.0 patch where they 
> introduce NFS support? The Libvirt current version 6.10.0 patch? A 
> future patch number (e.g. Libvirt version 6.11.0 or similar)? We were 
> unclear on what exact number goes here, but we were planning on 
> putting it into the space parallel to the :since: in the gluster line.


You would put the version that libvirt will be at when the feature is in 
released code, so if it was pushed today, that would be 7.0.0. 
(Sometimes we also indicate a minimum qemu or kernel version that's 
required, which is more useful if a feature is just newly supported in 
qemu/kernel but over time it just becomes extra numbers to confuse 
people. In this case, my opinion would be that the qemu version is old 
enough that it's not necessary to mention it.)

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/attachments/20201215/67b5fa44/attachment-0001.htm>