[libvirt PATCH 0/6] Introduce Local Migration Support in Libvirt
Daniel P. Berrangé
berrange at redhat.com
Mon Feb 3 13:45:40 UTC 2020
On Mon, Feb 03, 2020 at 10:42:48AM -0300, Daniel Henrique Barboza wrote:
> Hi Daniel,
>
> I am happy that Libvirt is pushing local migration/live patching support, but
> at the same time I am wondering what changed from what you said here:
Err, this isn't libvirt pushing local migration. I'm simply re-posting
these patches on behalf of Shaju who is unable to post the patches due
to our broken mail server. Don't take this as meaning that I approve of
the patches. They're simply here for discussion as any other patch
proposal is.
> https://www.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/2017-September/msg00489.html
That is largely still my view.
> To give you a background, we have live patching enhancements in IBM backlog
> since a few years ago, and one on the reasons these were being postponed
> time and time again were the lack of Libvirt support and this direction of
> "Libvirt is not interested in supporting it". And this message above was being
> used internally as the rationale for it.
Regards,
Daniel
--
|: https://berrange.com -o- https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :|
|: https://libvirt.org -o- https://fstop138.berrange.com :|
|: https://entangle-photo.org -o- https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :|
More information about the libvir-list
mailing list