[libvirt PATCH 0/6] Introduce Local Migration Support in Libvirt

Daniel P. Berrangé berrange at redhat.com
Mon Feb 3 13:45:40 UTC 2020


On Mon, Feb 03, 2020 at 10:42:48AM -0300, Daniel Henrique Barboza wrote:
> Hi Daniel,
> 
> I am happy that Libvirt is pushing local migration/live patching support, but
> at the same time I am wondering what changed from what you said here:

Err, this isn't libvirt pushing local migration. I'm simply re-posting
these patches on behalf of Shaju who is unable to post the patches due
to our broken mail server.  Don't take this as meaning that I approve of
the patches. They're simply here for discussion as any other patch
proposal is.

> https://www.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/2017-September/msg00489.html

That is largely still my view.

> To give you a background, we have live patching enhancements in IBM backlog
> since a few years ago, and one on the reasons these were being postponed
> time and time again were the lack of Libvirt support and this direction of
> "Libvirt is not interested in supporting it". And this message above was being
> used internally as the rationale for it.

Regards,
Daniel
-- 
|: https://berrange.com      -o-    https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :|
|: https://libvirt.org         -o-            https://fstop138.berrange.com :|
|: https://entangle-photo.org    -o-    https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :|




More information about the libvir-list mailing list