[PATCH 12/15] docs: Document the new <slices> sub-element of disk's <source>
Peter Krempa
pkrempa at redhat.com
Thu Feb 6 15:55:33 UTC 2020
On Thu, Feb 06, 2020 at 16:49:05 +0100, Ján Tomko wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 06, 2020 at 08:52:04AM +0100, Peter Krempa wrote:
[...]
> > + <group>
> > + <element name='slice'>
> > + <attribute name='type'>
> > + <value>storage</value>
> > + </attribute>
> > + <ref name="diskSourceSlice"/>
> > + </element>
> > + </group>
> > + <group>
> > + <element name='slice'>
> > + <attribute name='type'>
> > + <value>format</value>
> > + </attribute>
> > + <ref name="diskSourceSlice"/>
>
> Not sure why you use groups if the only choice is between
> the values of the type attribute.
What I really wanted to express is that I wanted to allow only 0 or 1
slice with type storage and 0 or 1 slice of type format in any order,
but my RNG-fu was not strong enough. I forgot to optimize it after the
attempts. :(
Any ideas how to achieve the above? Otherwise I'll optimize it.
More information about the libvir-list
mailing list