[PATCH 12/15] docs: Document the new <slices> sub-element of disk's <source>

Peter Krempa pkrempa at redhat.com
Thu Feb 6 15:55:33 UTC 2020


On Thu, Feb 06, 2020 at 16:49:05 +0100, Ján Tomko wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 06, 2020 at 08:52:04AM +0100, Peter Krempa wrote:

[...]

> > +            <group>
> > +              <element name='slice'>
> > +                <attribute name='type'>
> > +                  <value>storage</value>
> > +                </attribute>
> > +                <ref name="diskSourceSlice"/>
> > +              </element>
> > +            </group>
> > +            <group>
> > +              <element name='slice'>
> > +                <attribute name='type'>
> > +                  <value>format</value>
> > +                </attribute>
> > +                <ref name="diskSourceSlice"/>
> 
> Not sure why you use groups if the only choice is between
> the values of the type attribute.

What I really wanted to express is that I wanted to allow only 0 or 1
slice with type storage and 0 or 1 slice of type format in any order,
but my RNG-fu was not strong enough. I forgot to optimize it after the
attempts. :(

Any ideas how to achieve the above? Otherwise I'll optimize it.




More information about the libvir-list mailing list