[PATCH 08/13] conf: Parse and format HMAT

Michal Privoznik mprivozn at redhat.com
Wed Jul 8 08:03:12 UTC 2020

On 7/3/20 11:51 AM, Michal Privoznik wrote:
> On 7/3/20 11:23 AM, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
>> On Wed, Jun 24, 2020 at 03:49:06PM +0200, Michal Privoznik wrote:
>>> To cite ACPI specification:

>> Functionally the XML looks find to me, but I was just thinking it looks
>> a bit wierd to have <bandwidth> under a <latencies> wrapper. I'm not
>> entirely sure what better name we should use - perhaps "interconnects" ?
>>         <interconnects>
>>           <latency initiator='0' target='0' type='access' value='5'/>
>>           <latency initiator='0' target='0' cache='1' type='access' 
>> value='10'/>
>>           <bandwidth initiator='0' target='0' type='access' 
>> value='204800' unit='KiB'/>
>>         </interconnects>
>> any other ideas ?
> That sounds better. Or we can admit this is HMAT an have <hmat/> instead 
> <interconnects/>? But that won't be much future proof so your suggestion 
> sound better.

Alright, no one suggested anything better and I'd like to push these to 
get the most out of the development window possible. I'll change this to 
<interconnects/> and push. We can still change it until the release, if 


More information about the libvir-list mailing list